Skip to content

Conversation

@weareoutman
Copy link
Member

@weareoutman weareoutman commented Nov 27, 2024

依赖检查

组件之间的依赖声明,是微服务组件架构下的重要信息,请确保其正确性。

请勾选以下两组选项其中之一:

  • 本次 MR 没有使用上游组件(例如框架、后台组件等)的较新版本提供的特性。

或者:

  • 本次 MR 使用了上游组件(例如框架、后台组件等)的较新版本提供的特性。
  • 在对应的文件中更新了该上游组件的依赖版本(或确认了当前声明的依赖版本已包含本次 MR 使用的新特性)。

提交信息检查

Git 提交信息将决定包的版本发布及自动生成的 CHANGELOG,请检查工作内容与提交信息是否相符,并在以下每组选项中都依次确认。

破坏性变更是针对于下游使用者而言,可以通过本次改动对下游使用者的影响来识别变更类型:

  • 下游使用者不做任何改动,仍可以正常工作时,那么它属于普通变更。
  • 反之,下游使用者不做改动就无法正常工作时,那么它属于破坏性变更。

例如,构件修改了一个属性名,小产品 Storyboard 中需要使用新属性名才能工作,那么它就是破坏性变更。
又例如,构件还没有任何下游使用者,那么它的任何变更都是普通变更。

破坏性变更:

  • ⚠️ 本次 MR 包含破坏性变更的提交,请继续确认以下所有选项:
  • 没有更好的兼容方案,必须做破坏性变更。
  • 使用了 feat 作为提交类型。
  • 标注了 BREAKING CHANGE: 你的变更说明
  • 同时更新了本仓库中所有下游使用者的调用。
  • 同时更新了本仓库中所有下游使用者对该子包的依赖为即将发布的 major 版本。
  • 同时为其它仓库的 Migrating 做好了准备,例如文档或批量改动的方法。
  • 手动验证过破坏性变更在 Migrate 后可以正常工作。
  • 破坏性变更所在的提交没有意外携带其它子包的改动。

新特性:

  • 本次 MR 包含新特性的提交,且该提交不带有破坏性变更,并使用了 feat 作为提交类型。
  • 给新特性添加了单元测试。
  • 手动验证过新特性可以正常工作。

问题修复:

  • 本次 MR 包含问题修复的提交,且该提交不带有新特性或破坏性变更,并使用了 fix 作为提交类型。
  • 给问题修复添加了单元测试。
  • 手动验证过问题修复得到解决。

杂项工作:

即所有对下游使用者无任何影响、且没有必要显示在 CHANGELOG 中的改动,例如修改注释、测试用例、开发文档等:

  • 本次 MR 包含杂项工作的提交,且该提交不带有问题修复、新特性或破坏性变更,并使用了 chore, docs, test 等作为提交类型。

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • 新特性

    • 增强了渲染模块的错误处理和控制流,改进了对跟踪控件的支持。
    • RenderPlaceholder 接口中新增可选属性 tracking,允许跟踪特定状态或行为。
  • 测试

    • 扩展了对 Renderer 模块的测试,涵盖了多种路由场景和砖块渲染情况。
    • 添加了新的测试用例以验证控制节点的行为,确保系统在不同条件下的正确性。

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 27, 2024

Walkthrough

本次更改主要集中在Renderer模块的测试和实现上。测试套件中增加了对路由和砖块渲染功能的多种场景的测试,包括重定向、子路由和错误处理。同时,Renderer.ts文件中的渲染函数进行了错误处理和控制流程的增强,特别是引入了tracking变量以改进生命周期管理和错误边界处理。此外,RenderPlaceholder接口新增了可选的tracking属性,增强了其功能。测试用例也进行了相应的更新和扩展,以确保更全面的覆盖。

Changes

文件路径 更改摘要
packages/runtime/src/internal/Renderer.spec.ts 增加了对路由和砖块渲染的测试,涵盖重定向、子路由和错误处理,扩展了对renderBrick的测试场景。
packages/runtime/src/internal/Renderer.ts 更新了renderBrick函数,引入tracking变量,改进了生命周期管理和错误处理逻辑。
packages/runtime/src/internal/interfaces.ts RenderPlaceholder接口中添加了可选属性tracking
packages/runtime/src/internal/secret_internals.spec.ts 重命名了测试用例并添加了新测试,验证了renderUseBrick在不同控制节点下的行为。
packages/runtime/src/internal/secret_internals.ts 更新了renderUseBrick函数的错误处理逻辑,确保输出节点的tracking属性被正确处理,并更新了多个函数的签名。

Warning

There were issues while running some tools. Please review the errors and either fix the tool’s configuration or disable the tool if it’s a critical failure.

🔧 eslint

If the error stems from missing dependencies, add them to the package.json file. For unrecoverable errors (e.g., due to private dependencies), disable the tool in the CodeRabbit configuration.

packages/runtime/src/internal/Renderer.spec.ts

Oops! Something went wrong! :(

ESLint: 8.57.1

ESLint couldn't find the config "@next-core/eslint-config-next" to extend from. Please check that the name of the config is correct.

The config "@next-core/eslint-config-next" was referenced from the config file in "/.eslintrc".

If you still have problems, please stop by https://eslint.org/chat/help to chat with the team.


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copilot reviewed 5 out of 5 changed files in this pull request and generated no suggestions.

@cypress
Copy link

cypress bot commented Nov 27, 2024

next-core    Run #10803

Run Properties:  status check passed Passed #10803  •  git commit a6bf75c35c ℹ️: Merge 27a7bdbf47ca2e698bd87b5d3274a578f46255eb into 88b6d23b476b970add53676df48b...
Project next-core
Branch Review steve/v3-fix-use-brick
Run status status check passed Passed #10803
Run duration 00m 24s
Commit git commit a6bf75c35c ℹ️: Merge 27a7bdbf47ca2e698bd87b5d3274a578f46255eb into 88b6d23b476b970add53676df48b...
Committer Shenwei Wang
View all properties for this run ↗︎

Test results
Tests that failed  Failures 0
Tests that were flaky  Flaky 0
Tests that did not run due to a developer annotating a test with .skip  Pending 0
Tests that did not run due to a failure in a mocha hook  Skipped 0
Tests that passed  Passing 16
View all changes introduced in this branch ↗︎

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (4)
packages/runtime/src/internal/interfaces.ts (1)

68-68: 建议添加 JSDoc 注释说明该属性的用途

为了提高代码的可维护性,建议为 tracking 属性添加 JSDoc 注释,说明其用途和影响。

建议添加如下注释:

+ /** 是否启用节点跟踪。当设置为 false 时,该占位符将被视为非跟踪控制节点。 */
  tracking?: boolean;
packages/runtime/src/internal/secret_internals.ts (1)

112-117: 代码逻辑正确,建议补充单元测试

代码变更符合PR的目标,允许根砖块作为被忽略的非跟踪控制节点。新增的条件判断可以准确区分tracking和非tracking的占位符节点。

建议添加以下场景的单元测试:

  1. 验证带tracking属性的占位符节点会抛出预期的错误
  2. 验证不带tracking属性的占位符节点会被正确设置为undefined

需要我帮您生成相关的单元测试代码吗?

packages/runtime/src/internal/secret_internals.spec.ts (1)

544-580: 建议添加更多边缘场景测试

建议考虑添加以下场景的测试:

  1. 当 dataSource 为其他表达式类型时的情况
  2. 当有多个子节点时的情况
  3. 当子节点也是控制节点时的情况
packages/runtime/src/internal/Renderer.spec.ts (1)

Line range hint 90-90: 请删除冗余的 expect 调用

在第90行,expect(preCheckPermissionsForBrickOrRoute); 缺少断言方法,可能是不必要的或未完成的断言。请检查并删除或完善此行。

建议修改:

-    expect(preCheckPermissionsForBrickOrRoute);
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 88b6d23 and 27a7bdb.

📒 Files selected for processing (5)
  • packages/runtime/src/internal/Renderer.spec.ts (2 hunks)
  • packages/runtime/src/internal/Renderer.ts (3 hunks)
  • packages/runtime/src/internal/interfaces.ts (1 hunks)
  • packages/runtime/src/internal/secret_internals.spec.ts (1 hunks)
  • packages/runtime/src/internal/secret_internals.ts (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (8)
packages/runtime/src/internal/interfaces.ts (2)

68-68: 代码变更看起来不错!

新增的 tracking 可选属性能够支持非跟踪控制节点的功能,这与 PR 的目标相符。


68-68: 验证 tracking 属性在相关文件中的使用情况

需要确保该属性在 Renderer.ts 和其他相关文件中得到正确处理。

✅ Verification successful

Let me gather more specific information about the tracking property usage in the renderer logic.


tracking 属性的使用已得到验证

根据代码分析结果,tracking 属性已在以下位置得到正确处理:

  • interfaces.ts 中作为可选布尔属性定义
  • Renderer.ts 中用于跟踪上下文和属性计算
  • 在测试用例中有相应的覆盖(Renderer.spec.ts

该属性的实现和使用符合预期,不需要额外修改。

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# 描述:检查 tracking 属性的使用情况

# 搜索 tracking 属性的使用
rg -A 5 "tracking.*?:" packages/runtime/src/

# 搜索相关的渲染逻辑
ast-grep --pattern 'function renderBrick($_) {
  $$$
}'

Length of output: 5212


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for tracking property usage in render logic
ast-grep --pattern 'function renderBrick($params) {
  $$$
  tracking
  $$$
}'

# Search for tracking related interfaces and types
ast-grep --pattern 'interface $_ {
  $$$
  tracking?: boolean;
  $$$
}'

# Search for tracking property assignments
rg -A 3 "tracking: " packages/runtime/src/

Length of output: 747

packages/runtime/src/internal/secret_internals.ts (1)

112-117: 验证代码库中的相关使用场景

为确保此更改不会影响现有功能,建议验证以下内容:

  1. 检查代码库中useBrick的使用场景
  2. 确认相关错误处理的一致性
✅ Verification successful

验证结果:代码更改是安全且必要的

这个更改是对 useBrick 根节点的重要安全检查,具体原因如下:

  1. 该检查防止 useBrick 的根节点成为被忽略的 tracking control node,这是一个必要的限制。
  2. 从测试用例和错误处理代码可以看出,这是一个经过充分验证的设计决策。
  3. 当检测到这种情况时,通过将 node 设置为 undefined 来确保正确的错误处理流程。

代码变更的影响范围是可控的:

  • 仅影响 useBrick 的根节点验证逻辑
  • 有完整的单元测试覆盖
  • 错误信息清晰明确,有助于开发者快速定位问题
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# 描述:搜索代码库中useBrick的使用场景和相关错误处理

# 测试1:查找useBrick的使用场景,特别关注placeholder节点的使用
rg -A 5 "useBrick.*placeholder"

# 测试2:查找相关错误处理代码
ast-grep --pattern 'throw new Error("The root brick of useBrick")'

Length of output: 102


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# 让我们使用更广泛的搜索策略

# 搜索1:查找所有useBrick的使用
rg -A 5 "useBrick"

# 搜索2:查找与tracking相关的错误处理
rg -A 5 "tracking.*Error"

# 搜索3:查找secret_internals.ts文件的内容以了解上下文
fd -t f "secret_internals.ts" --exec cat {}

# 搜索4:查找与useBrick相关的node处理
ast-grep --pattern 'useBrick($$$) {
  $$$
  node
  $$$
}'

Length of output: 102789


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# 让我们专注于与tracking相关的代码

# 搜索1:查找tracking相关的错误处理和节点处理
ast-grep --pattern 'if ($$$tracking$$$) {
  throw new Error($$$)
}'

# 搜索2:查找与tracking node相关的其他代码
rg -A 5 "tracking.*node"

# 搜索3:查找与useBrick和tracking相关的测试用例
rg -A 5 "useBrick.*tracking|tracking.*useBrick"

Length of output: 4128

packages/runtime/src/internal/secret_internals.spec.ts (2)

544-561: 测试用例结构清晰且完整!

测试用例很好地验证了当根砖块是被忽略的跟踪控制节点时的错误处理。设置和清理都很完整。


563-580: 测试用例补充了重要的边缘场景!

这个测试用例很好地补充了非跟踪控制节点的场景测试。测试结构完整,断言明确。

packages/runtime/src/internal/Renderer.ts (3)

442-442: 添加 tracking 变量

在第442行,新增了 tracking 变量,其值为 !!(contextNames || stateNames),用于判断是否存在跟踪的上下文名称或状态名称。


591-591: 在节点对象中添加 tracking 属性

第591行在 node 对象中添加了 tracking 属性,确保节点包含跟踪状态的信息。


603-603: 根据 tracking 状态设置 hasTrackingControls

第603行新增了对 tracking 的判断,用于设置 controlledOutput.hasTrackingControls 的值。这确保了当存在跟踪条件时,controlledOutput 正确地反映其拥有跟踪控制。

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 27, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 95.23%. Comparing base (88b6d23) to head (27a7bdb).
Report is 2 commits behind head on v3.

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##               v3    #4572   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   95.23%   95.23%           
=======================================
  Files         206      206           
  Lines        8935     8938    +3     
  Branches     1705     1707    +2     
=======================================
+ Hits         8509     8512    +3     
  Misses        319      319           
  Partials      107      107           
Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
packages/runtime/src/internal/Renderer.ts 94.42% <100.00%> (+0.01%) ⬆️
packages/runtime/src/internal/secret_internals.ts 95.03% <100.00%> (+0.07%) ⬆️

@weareoutman weareoutman requested a review from panzekun November 27, 2024 02:30
@panzekun panzekun merged commit 84e8589 into v3 Nov 27, 2024
8 checks passed
@panzekun panzekun deleted the steve/v3-fix-use-brick branch November 27, 2024 02:33
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants