-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 11
fix(): allow root brick of useBrick to be an ignored non-tracking control node #4572
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
Walkthrough本次更改主要集中在 Changes
Warning There were issues while running some tools. Please review the errors and either fix the tool’s configuration or disable the tool if it’s a critical failure. 🔧 eslint
packages/runtime/src/internal/Renderer.spec.tsOops! Something went wrong! :( ESLint: 8.57.1 ESLint couldn't find the config "@next-core/eslint-config-next" to extend from. Please check that the name of the config is correct. The config "@next-core/eslint-config-next" was referenced from the config file in "/.eslintrc". If you still have problems, please stop by https://eslint.org/chat/help to chat with the team. Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Copilot reviewed 5 out of 5 changed files in this pull request and generated no suggestions.
next-core
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Project |
next-core
|
| Branch Review |
steve/v3-fix-use-brick
|
| Run status |
|
| Run duration | 00m 24s |
| Commit |
|
| Committer | Shenwei Wang |
| View all properties for this run ↗︎ | |
| Test results | |
|---|---|
|
|
0
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
16
|
| View all changes introduced in this branch ↗︎ | |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (4)
packages/runtime/src/internal/interfaces.ts (1)
68-68: 建议添加 JSDoc 注释说明该属性的用途为了提高代码的可维护性,建议为
tracking属性添加 JSDoc 注释,说明其用途和影响。建议添加如下注释:
+ /** 是否启用节点跟踪。当设置为 false 时,该占位符将被视为非跟踪控制节点。 */ tracking?: boolean;packages/runtime/src/internal/secret_internals.ts (1)
112-117: 代码逻辑正确,建议补充单元测试代码变更符合PR的目标,允许根砖块作为被忽略的非跟踪控制节点。新增的条件判断可以准确区分tracking和非tracking的占位符节点。
建议添加以下场景的单元测试:
- 验证带tracking属性的占位符节点会抛出预期的错误
- 验证不带tracking属性的占位符节点会被正确设置为undefined
需要我帮您生成相关的单元测试代码吗?
packages/runtime/src/internal/secret_internals.spec.ts (1)
544-580: 建议添加更多边缘场景测试建议考虑添加以下场景的测试:
- 当 dataSource 为其他表达式类型时的情况
- 当有多个子节点时的情况
- 当子节点也是控制节点时的情况
packages/runtime/src/internal/Renderer.spec.ts (1)
Line range hint
90-90: 请删除冗余的expect调用在第90行,
expect(preCheckPermissionsForBrickOrRoute);缺少断言方法,可能是不必要的或未完成的断言。请检查并删除或完善此行。建议修改:
- expect(preCheckPermissionsForBrickOrRoute);
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
packages/runtime/src/internal/Renderer.spec.ts(2 hunks)packages/runtime/src/internal/Renderer.ts(3 hunks)packages/runtime/src/internal/interfaces.ts(1 hunks)packages/runtime/src/internal/secret_internals.spec.ts(1 hunks)packages/runtime/src/internal/secret_internals.ts(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (8)
packages/runtime/src/internal/interfaces.ts (2)
68-68: 代码变更看起来不错!
新增的 tracking 可选属性能够支持非跟踪控制节点的功能,这与 PR 的目标相符。
68-68: 验证 tracking 属性在相关文件中的使用情况
需要确保该属性在 Renderer.ts 和其他相关文件中得到正确处理。
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more specific information about the tracking property usage in the renderer logic.
tracking 属性的使用已得到验证
根据代码分析结果,tracking 属性已在以下位置得到正确处理:
- 在
interfaces.ts中作为可选布尔属性定义 - 在
Renderer.ts中用于跟踪上下文和属性计算 - 在测试用例中有相应的覆盖(
Renderer.spec.ts)
该属性的实现和使用符合预期,不需要额外修改。
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# 描述:检查 tracking 属性的使用情况
# 搜索 tracking 属性的使用
rg -A 5 "tracking.*?:" packages/runtime/src/
# 搜索相关的渲染逻辑
ast-grep --pattern 'function renderBrick($_) {
$$$
}'
Length of output: 5212
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for tracking property usage in render logic
ast-grep --pattern 'function renderBrick($params) {
$$$
tracking
$$$
}'
# Search for tracking related interfaces and types
ast-grep --pattern 'interface $_ {
$$$
tracking?: boolean;
$$$
}'
# Search for tracking property assignments
rg -A 3 "tracking: " packages/runtime/src/
Length of output: 747
packages/runtime/src/internal/secret_internals.ts (1)
112-117: 验证代码库中的相关使用场景
为确保此更改不会影响现有功能,建议验证以下内容:
- 检查代码库中useBrick的使用场景
- 确认相关错误处理的一致性
✅ Verification successful
验证结果:代码更改是安全且必要的
这个更改是对 useBrick 根节点的重要安全检查,具体原因如下:
- 该检查防止 useBrick 的根节点成为被忽略的 tracking control node,这是一个必要的限制。
- 从测试用例和错误处理代码可以看出,这是一个经过充分验证的设计决策。
- 当检测到这种情况时,通过将 node 设置为 undefined 来确保正确的错误处理流程。
代码变更的影响范围是可控的:
- 仅影响 useBrick 的根节点验证逻辑
- 有完整的单元测试覆盖
- 错误信息清晰明确,有助于开发者快速定位问题
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# 描述:搜索代码库中useBrick的使用场景和相关错误处理
# 测试1:查找useBrick的使用场景,特别关注placeholder节点的使用
rg -A 5 "useBrick.*placeholder"
# 测试2:查找相关错误处理代码
ast-grep --pattern 'throw new Error("The root brick of useBrick")'
Length of output: 102
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# 让我们使用更广泛的搜索策略
# 搜索1:查找所有useBrick的使用
rg -A 5 "useBrick"
# 搜索2:查找与tracking相关的错误处理
rg -A 5 "tracking.*Error"
# 搜索3:查找secret_internals.ts文件的内容以了解上下文
fd -t f "secret_internals.ts" --exec cat {}
# 搜索4:查找与useBrick相关的node处理
ast-grep --pattern 'useBrick($$$) {
$$$
node
$$$
}'
Length of output: 102789
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# 让我们专注于与tracking相关的代码
# 搜索1:查找tracking相关的错误处理和节点处理
ast-grep --pattern 'if ($$$tracking$$$) {
throw new Error($$$)
}'
# 搜索2:查找与tracking node相关的其他代码
rg -A 5 "tracking.*node"
# 搜索3:查找与useBrick和tracking相关的测试用例
rg -A 5 "useBrick.*tracking|tracking.*useBrick"
Length of output: 4128
packages/runtime/src/internal/secret_internals.spec.ts (2)
544-561: 测试用例结构清晰且完整!
测试用例很好地验证了当根砖块是被忽略的跟踪控制节点时的错误处理。设置和清理都很完整。
563-580: 测试用例补充了重要的边缘场景!
这个测试用例很好地补充了非跟踪控制节点的场景测试。测试结构完整,断言明确。
packages/runtime/src/internal/Renderer.ts (3)
442-442: 添加 tracking 变量
在第442行,新增了 tracking 变量,其值为 !!(contextNames || stateNames),用于判断是否存在跟踪的上下文名称或状态名称。
591-591: 在节点对象中添加 tracking 属性
第591行在 node 对象中添加了 tracking 属性,确保节点包含跟踪状态的信息。
603-603: 根据 tracking 状态设置 hasTrackingControls
第603行新增了对 tracking 的判断,用于设置 controlledOutput.hasTrackingControls 的值。这确保了当存在跟踪条件时,controlledOutput 正确地反映其拥有跟踪控制。
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## v3 #4572 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 95.23% 95.23%
=======================================
Files 206 206
Lines 8935 8938 +3
Branches 1705 1707 +2
=======================================
+ Hits 8509 8512 +3
Misses 319 319
Partials 107 107
|
依赖检查
组件之间的依赖声明,是微服务组件架构下的重要信息,请确保其正确性。
请勾选以下两组选项其中之一:
或者:
提交信息检查
Git 提交信息将决定包的版本发布及自动生成的 CHANGELOG,请检查工作内容与提交信息是否相符,并在以下每组选项中都依次确认。
破坏性变更:
feat作为提交类型。BREAKING CHANGE: 你的变更说明。新特性:
feat作为提交类型。问题修复:
fix作为提交类型。杂项工作:
即所有对下游使用者无任何影响、且没有必要显示在 CHANGELOG 中的改动,例如修改注释、测试用例、开发文档等:
chore,docs,test等作为提交类型。Summary by CodeRabbit
新特性
RenderPlaceholder接口中新增可选属性tracking,允许跟踪特定状态或行为。测试
Renderer模块的测试,涵盖了多种路由场景和砖块渲染情况。