Skip to content

Signer interface definition and implementation #113

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Mar 3, 2025

Conversation

Korbik
Copy link
Contributor

@Korbik Korbik commented Feb 12, 2025

No description provided.

@Korbik Korbik mentioned this pull request Feb 12, 2025
Copy link
Collaborator

@divarvel divarvel left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

overall LGTM, i indeed think that making KeyPair a subtype of Signer and not the other way around is the right modeling.

I have left a few questions / comments, most of them not blocking, except the one about root key ids in UnverifiedBiscuit.

A few other things look fishy, but are not strictly related to this PR

@divarvel divarvel merged commit d92eee4 into eclipse-biscuit:main Mar 3, 2025
2 checks passed
@itstheceo
Copy link
Contributor

Looks great, sorry for the late look; have been travelling.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants