Skip to content

fix: don’t rely on lists in closures sample#289

Merged
divarvel merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
fix-closures-sample
Jul 15, 2025
Merged

fix: don’t rely on lists in closures sample#289
divarvel merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
fix-closures-sample

Conversation

@divarvel

@divarvel divarvel commented Jun 8, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

The samples have been designed to map to specific features, in order to help gradual implementation of 3.3 features. The closures are meant to be implemented before lists and maps, so this sample should not rely on lists being implemented

@divarvel divarvel force-pushed the fix-closures-sample branch 2 times, most recently from 395435f to a82ad5f Compare June 11, 2025 12:42
The samples have been designed to map to specific features, in order to
help gradual implementation of 3.3 features. The closures are meant to be
implemented before lists and maps, so this sample should not rely on lists
being implemented

TODO: regen samples
@divarvel divarvel force-pushed the fix-closures-sample branch from a82ad5f to d2fb5ce Compare July 15, 2025 13:41
@divarvel divarvel merged commit 50f3c8b into main Jul 15, 2025
4 checks passed
divarvel added a commit to eclipse-biscuit/biscuit that referenced this pull request Sep 16, 2025
- Use sets in closures sample eclipse-biscuit/biscuit-rust#289
- Add a case for check all with no matches eclipse-biscuit/biscuit-rust#294
- Add missing case in heterogeneous equals sample eclipse-biscuit/biscuit-rust#309
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant