Events predicate

[stbischof]

@timothyjward any thoughts on that?

[timothyjward]

Can you give an example of a test using these new predicates, and how it compares to the existing support? I can't quite wrap my head around how "normal usage" will look

[stbischof]

exampleIntegrationTest() throws Exception {
		MonitoringAssertion.executeAndObserve(() -> {

			ServiceRegistration<Serializable> sr = bc.registerService(Serializable.class, new Serializable() {},
				Dictionaries.dictionaryOf("k", "v0"));

			sr.setProperties(Dictionaries.dictionaryOf("k", "v1"));
			sr.setProperties(Dictionaries.dictionaryOf("k", "v2"));
			sr.unregister();

		})
			.untilNoMoreServiceEventWithin(100l)// main stop-condition criteria
			.assertWithTimeoutThat(3000)// timeout to granite a stop
			.hasNoThrowable()// not exception thrown while executed
			.isNotTimedOut()// check that NOT timed-out
			.hasServiceEventsInOrder(//
				listOf(ServiceEventConditions.matches(ServiceEvent.REGISTERED, "(k=v0)"), //
					ServiceEventConditions.typeModifiedAndObjectClass(Serializable.class), //
					ServiceEventConditions.typeUnregisteringAndObjectClass(Serializable.class)))//
			.hasServiceEventsInExactOrder(//
				listOf(ServiceEventConditions.typeRegisteredWith(Serializable.class, mapOf("k", "v0")), //
					ServiceEventConditions.typeModifiedAndObjectClass(Serializable.class), //
					ServiceEventConditions.typeModifiedAndObjectClass(Serializable.class), //
					ServiceEventConditions.matches(ServiceEvent.UNREGISTERING, Serializable.class, mapOf("k", "v2"))))//
			.hasAtLeastNServiceEventModifiedWith(2, Serializable.class)//
			.hasAtMostNServiceEventModifiedWith(2, Serializable.class)//
			.hasExactlyNServiceEventModifiedWith(2, Serializable.class)//
			.hasExactlyOneServiceEventRegisteredWith(Serializable.class)//
			.hasAtLeastOneServiceEventModifiedWith(Serializable.class)//
			.hasAtLeastOneServiceEventUnregisteringWith(Serializable.class)//
			.hasAtLeastOneServiceEventWith(ServiceEvent.REGISTERED, "(k=v0)")//
			.hasAtLeastOneServiceEventRegisteredWith(Serializable.class, mapOf("k", "v0"))//
			.hasAtLeastOneServiceEventModifiedWith(Serializable.class, mapOf("k", "v1"))//
			.hasAtLeastOneServiceEventUnregisteringWith(Serializable.class, mapOf("k", "v2"))//
			.hasAtLeastOneServiceEventWith(ServiceEvent.REGISTERED, Serializable.class)

			.hasNoServiceEventWith(ServiceEvent.REGISTERED, "(k=v4)");

'''

[stbischof]

exampleIntegrationTest() throws Exception {
 		MonitoringAssertion.executeAndObserve(() -> {
 			ServiceRegistration<Serializable> sr = bc.registerService(Serializable.class, new Serializable() {}, 				Dictionaries.dictionaryOf("k", "v0"));
 			sr.setProperties(Dictionaries.dictionaryOf("k", "v1"));
 			sr.setProperties(Dictionaries.dictionaryOf("k", "v2"));
 			sr.unregister();
 		})
 			.untilNoMoreServiceEventWithin(100l)// main stop-condition criteria
 			.assertWithTimeoutThat(3000)// timeout to granite a stop
 			.hasNoThrowable()// not exception thrown while executed
 			.isNotTimedOut()// check that NOT timed-out
 			.hasServiceEventsInOrder(//
 				listOf(ServiceEventConditions.matches(ServiceEvent.REGISTERED, "(k=v0)"), //
 					ServiceEventConditions.typeModifiedAndObjectClass(Serializable.class), //
 					ServiceEventConditions.typeUnregisteringAndObjectClass(Serializable.class)))//
 			.hasServiceEventsInExactOrder(//
 				listOf(ServiceEventConditions.typeRegisteredWith(Serializable.class, mapOf("k", "v0")), //
 					ServiceEventConditions.typeModifiedAndObjectClass(Serializable.class), //
 					ServiceEventConditions.typeModifiedAndObjectClass(Serializable.class), //
 					ServiceEventConditions.matches(ServiceEvent.UNREGISTERING, Serializable.class, mapOf("k", "v2"))))//
 			.hasAtLeastNServiceEventModifiedWith(2, Serializable.class)//
 			.hasAtMostNServiceEventModifiedWith(2, Serializable.class)//
 			.hasExactlyNServiceEventModifiedWith(2, Serializable.class)//
 			.hasExactlyOneServiceEventRegisteredWith(Serializable.class)//
 			.hasAtLeastOneServiceEventModifiedWith(Serializable.class)//
 			.hasAtLeastOneServiceEventUnregisteringWith(Serializable.class)//
 			.hasAtLeastOneServiceEventWith(ServiceEvent.REGISTERED, "(k=v0)")//
 			.hasAtLeastOneServiceEventRegisteredWith(Serializable.class, mapOf("k", "v0"))//
 			.hasAtLeastOneServiceEventModifiedWith(Serializable.class, mapOf("k", "v1"))//
 			.hasAtLeastOneServiceEventUnregisteringWith(Serializable.class, mapOf("k", "v2"))//
 			.hasAtLeastOneServiceEventWith(ServiceEvent.REGISTERED, Serializable.class)
 			.hasNoServiceEventWith(ServiceEvent.REGISTERED, "(k=v4)"); 

This was First though. Wen hooking in fw or Service Events aus waif for something

[github-actions]

This pull request has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. Given the limited bandwidth of the team, it will be closed if no further activity occurs. If you intend to work on this pull request, please reopen the PR. Thank you for your contributions.