Skip to content

Conversation

r-vanooyen
Copy link
Contributor

@r-vanooyen r-vanooyen commented Aug 9, 2024

PR for #5

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Aug 9, 2024

Code coverage report is ready! 📈

@r-vanooyen
Copy link
Contributor Author

r-vanooyen commented Aug 9, 2024

todo:

  • release 0.1.0 first
  • check for mqtt spec changes introduced by up-java 2.0.0 -> up-spec v1.6.0-alpha.2

@r-vanooyen r-vanooyen closed this Aug 9, 2024
@r-vanooyen r-vanooyen reopened this Aug 9, 2024
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Aug 9, 2024

Code coverage report is ready! 📈

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Aug 9, 2024

Code coverage report is ready! 📈

@r-vanooyen r-vanooyen changed the title Feature/5 java 2.0.0 Feature #5 java 2.0.0 Aug 9, 2024
.addLevel(Optional.ofNullable(sink).map(UUri::getUeVersionMajor).map(majorVersion -> String.format("%02x", majorVersion)).orElse(""))
.addLevel(Optional.ofNullable(sink).map(UUri::getResourceId).map(resourceId -> String.format("%04x", resourceId)).orElse(""))

.addLevel(String.format("%04x", source.getResourceId()));

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Doesn't this mean that source.resourceId() is the first level?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

No, it is the 4th level

Copy link

Code coverage report is ready! 📈

Copy link

Code coverage report is ready! 📈

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants