Skip to content

[CI validation – do not merge] PR 820 pipeline vs maintenance/gramps61 - #24

Closed
eduralph wants to merge 1 commit into
maintenance/gramps61from
ci-validate/gramps61
Closed

[CI validation – do not merge] PR 820 pipeline vs maintenance/gramps61#24
eduralph wants to merge 1 commit into
maintenance/gramps61from
ci-validate/gramps61

Conversation

@eduralph

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Throwaway: 820's pipeline + gap fixes overlaid on maintenance/gramps61 to exercise the fork CI (gramps61 series) against real gramps61 content. gramps61's baseline sync CI fails on Lint (pre-existing ruff content issue). Delete after observing.

…enance/gramps61

Same as the gramps60 validation, against gramps61 content. DO NOT MERGE.
@eduralph

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner Author

Validation done. gramps61: Linux unit + Integration green; Lint/Addon-Structure reds are pre-existing content. Windows hangs on TMGimporter.tests.test_libtmg.TestImportCitations.test_citation_attached_to_event (gramps61-only test; a TMG citation import that blocks on Windows). Both run_addon_tests and plain unittest lack a per-test timeout, so the job hangs indefinitely. Diagnosed; fix pending.

@eduralph eduralph closed this May 29, 2026
@eduralph
eduralph deleted the ci-validate/gramps61 branch May 29, 2026 19:54
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant