Skip to content

Conversation

@stefans-elastic
Copy link
Contributor

Proposed commit message

See title

Checklist

  • My code follows the style guidelines of this project
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • I have made corresponding change to the default configuration files
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works. Where relevant, I have used the stresstest.sh script to run them under stress conditions and race detector to verify their stability.
  • I have added an entry in ./changelog/fragments using the changelog tool.

Disruptive User Impact

Author's Checklist

  • [ ]

How to test this PR locally

Related issues

Use cases

Screenshots

Screenshot 2025-12-03 at 10 30 59

Logs

@stefans-elastic stefans-elastic requested a review from a team as a code owner December 3, 2025 12:37
@stefans-elastic stefans-elastic added enhancement Team:Obs-InfraObs Label for the Observability Infrastructure Monitoring team labels Dec 3, 2025
@botelastic botelastic bot added needs_team Indicates that the issue/PR needs a Team:* label and removed needs_team Indicates that the issue/PR needs a Team:* label labels Dec 3, 2025
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Dec 3, 2025

🤖 GitHub comments

Just comment with:

  • run docs-build : Re-trigger the docs validation. (use unformatted text in the comment!)

@mergify
Copy link
Contributor

mergify bot commented Dec 3, 2025

This pull request does not have a backport label.
If this is a bug or security fix, could you label this PR @stefans-elastic? 🙏.
For such, you'll need to label your PR with:

  • The upcoming major version of the Elastic Stack
  • The upcoming minor version of the Elastic Stack (if you're not pushing a breaking change)

To fixup this pull request, you need to add the backport labels for the needed
branches, such as:

  • backport-8./d is the label to automatically backport to the 8./d branch. /d is the digit
  • backport-active-all is the label that automatically backports to all active branches.
  • backport-active-8 is the label that automatically backports to all active minor branches for the 8 major.
  • backport-active-9 is the label that automatically backports to all active minor branches for the 9 major.

@stefans-elastic stefans-elastic requested a review from a team as a code owner December 3, 2025 13:47
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Dec 3, 2025

🔍 Preview links for changed docs

@shmsr shmsr requested a review from a team December 4, 2025 08:18
@stefans-elastic stefans-elastic requested a review from shmsr December 4, 2025 09:47
Copy link
Contributor

@colleenmcginnis colleenmcginnis left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Based on the lack of backport labels, I assume this change is going into the next minor version. If that's not correct, feel free to adjust. You'll need to regenerate the docs after making this change.

@stefans-elastic
Copy link
Contributor Author

@ishleenk17 I would like to ask your opinion on which versions do you think this should be backported to? backport-active-9 ?

@ishleenk17
Copy link
Member

@ishleenk17 I would like to ask your opinion on which versions do you think this should be backported to? backport-active-9 ?

Since its a new metric support, I would be ok to have it backported to active-9.x

@ishleenk17
Copy link
Member

@ishleenk17 I would like to ask your opinion on which versions do you think this should be backported to? backport-active-9 ?

Since its a new metric support, I would be ok to have it backported to active-9.x

@colleenmcginnis : Would the label 9.3 change in case we are backporting ?

@colleenmcginnis
Copy link
Contributor

@colleenmcginnis : Would the label 9.3 change in case we are backporting ?

Yes. You should update the version number in metricbeat/module/vsphere/cluster/_meta/fields.yml to the earliest version it is being added to.

@stefans-elastic
Copy link
Contributor Author

@colleenmcginnis : Would the label 9.3 change in case we are backporting ?

Yes. You should update the version number in metricbeat/module/vsphere/cluster/_meta/fields.yml to the earliest version it is being added to.

if I'm reading release schedule correctly the value should be 9.1.10, is it correct?

@stefans-elastic stefans-elastic added the backport-active-9 Automated backport with mergify to all the active 9.[0-9]+ branches label Dec 11, 2025
@stefans-elastic stefans-elastic merged commit d29d293 into elastic:main Dec 15, 2025
52 checks passed
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

@Mergifyio backport 9.1 9.2

@mergify
Copy link
Contributor

mergify bot commented Dec 15, 2025

backport 9.1 9.2

✅ Backports have been created

Details

mergify bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 15, 2025
* feat: add resource pool id to vSphere's cluster metricset

* fix field description

* fix field description

* fix unit test

* updated docs/reference/metricbeat/exported-fields-vsphere.md

* Apply suggestions from code review

Co-authored-by: subham s <[email protected]>

* fix change kind in changelog

* make update

* Update metricbeat/module/vsphere/cluster/_meta/fields.yml

Co-authored-by: Colleen McGinnis <[email protected]>

* make update

* update ga version of resourcepool.id field

---------

Co-authored-by: subham s <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Colleen McGinnis <[email protected]>
(cherry picked from commit d29d293)
mergify bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 15, 2025
* feat: add resource pool id to vSphere's cluster metricset

* fix field description

* fix field description

* fix unit test

* updated docs/reference/metricbeat/exported-fields-vsphere.md

* Apply suggestions from code review

Co-authored-by: subham s <[email protected]>

* fix change kind in changelog

* make update

* Update metricbeat/module/vsphere/cluster/_meta/fields.yml

Co-authored-by: Colleen McGinnis <[email protected]>

* make update

* update ga version of resourcepool.id field

---------

Co-authored-by: subham s <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Colleen McGinnis <[email protected]>
(cherry picked from commit d29d293)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

backport-active-9 Automated backport with mergify to all the active 9.[0-9]+ branches enhancement Team:Obs-InfraObs Label for the Observability Infrastructure Monitoring team

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants