[Docs] Add central config and update IncludeScopes#411
Conversation
🔍 Preview links for changed docs |
Vale Linting ResultsSummary: 3 suggestions found 💡 Suggestions (3)
The Vale linter checks documentation changes against the Elastic Docs style guide. To use Vale locally or report issues, refer to Elastic style guide for Vale. |
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded
To keep reviews running without waiting, you can enable usage-based add-on for your organization. This allows additional reviews beyond the hourly cap. Account admins can enable it under billing. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. ℹ️ Review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Organization UI Review profile: CHILL Plan: Enterprise Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (2)
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThis documentation update adds guidance for OpAMP central configuration in EDOT .NET. The configuration.md file introduces new OpAmpEndpoint and OpAmpHeaders options with service-name resolution behavior, clarifies HTTPS endpoint support with TLS limitations, and documents remote configuration management including which settings are remotely configurable. The edot-defaults.md file updates the IncludeScopes default from false to true and replaces historical notes with explanations about scope attribute inclusion and storage volume implications. 🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 1 | ❌ 1❌ Failed checks (1 inconclusive)
✅ Passed checks (1 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Review rate limit: 0/1 reviews remaining, refill in 53 minutes and 6 seconds.Comment |
|
@alexandra5000 Could you check? We might need to update the features table and the Central Config docs in the |
Co-authored-by: Aleksandra Spilkowska <96738481+alexandra5000@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Aleksandra Spilkowska <96738481+alexandra5000@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Aleksandra Spilkowska <96738481+alexandra5000@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Aleksandra Spilkowska <96738481+alexandra5000@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Aleksandra Spilkowska <96738481+alexandra5000@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Aleksandra Spilkowska <96738481+alexandra5000@users.noreply.github.com>
|
Thanks @alexandra5000 - I also just added some minor tweaks - Do we have a standard way to document when features are introduced? |
|
Hey @stevejgordon! If you want me to update the specific config options or features in the reference docs (like the features table and the Central Config docs in the We currently capture what's new per release in the release notes, but I'm not aware of any cross-repo standard for documenting individual features + their version info. I didn't have time yet to open a PR adding this to the reference docs in the |
As titled
Closes #404 and #405