Skip to content

Fork search action to search coordination pool #127251

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

original-brownbear
Copy link
Member

This action may take up to seconds due to heavyweight index name resolution etc. We need to make it forking to guarantee cluster stability. Still, not great to add another use of the coordination pool but forking to search for this one might have unforeseeable consequences in terms of latency so this seems like the best option for the time being.

This action may take up to seconds due to heavyweight index name resolution etc.
We need to make it forking to guarantee cluster stability.
Still, not great to add another use of the coordination pool but forking to search for this
one might have unforeseeable consequences in terms of latency so this seems like the best option
for the time being.
@elasticsearchmachine elasticsearchmachine added the Team:Search Relevance Meta label for the Search Relevance team in Elasticsearch label Apr 23, 2025
@elasticsearchmachine
Copy link
Collaborator

Pinging @elastic/es-search-relevance (Team:Search Relevance)

Copy link
Member

@benwtrent benwtrent left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this makes sense to me. it should be on coordinator pool regardless.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
>non-issue :Search Relevance/Search Catch all for Search Relevance Team:Search Relevance Meta label for the Search Relevance team in Elasticsearch v9.1.0
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants