Skip to content

[Unified Data Table] Split test into 3 smaller tests#245045

Merged
AlexGPlay merged 1 commit into
elastic:mainfrom
AlexGPlay:234829-split-test-in-smaller-tests
Dec 3, 2025
Merged

[Unified Data Table] Split test into 3 smaller tests#245045
AlexGPlay merged 1 commit into
elastic:mainfrom
AlexGPlay:234829-split-test-in-smaller-tests

Conversation

@AlexGPlay
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@AlexGPlay AlexGPlay commented Dec 3, 2025

Summary

Closes #234829

Right now we have the should show the reset width button only for absolute width columns, and allow resetting to default width test that is asserting 3 different things:

  • When resetting the width of the time column from absolute it goes back to the default
  • When resetting the width of a column that isn't the time column from absolute it goes back to the default
  • A column without absolute width can't be reset

This means that we can split the test into 3 smaller and more focused tests for each of those scenarios. This should help with the timeout as we are no longer waiting for a big one.

Checklist

Check the PR satisfies following conditions.

Reviewers should verify this PR satisfies this list as well.

  • Unit or functional tests were updated or added to match the most common scenarios
  • The PR description includes the appropriate Release Notes section, and the correct release_note:* label is applied per the guidelines
  • Review the backport guidelines and apply applicable backport:* labels.

@AlexGPlay AlexGPlay self-assigned this Dec 3, 2025
@AlexGPlay AlexGPlay added release_note:skip Skip the PR/issue when compiling release notes backport:skip This PR does not require backporting Team:DataDiscovery Discover, search (data plugin and KQL), data views, saved searches. For ES|QL, use Team:ES|QL. t// labels Dec 3, 2025
@elasticmachine
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

💛 Build succeeded, but was flaky

Failed CI Steps

Metrics [docs]

✅ unchanged

cc @AlexGPlay

@AlexGPlay AlexGPlay marked this pull request as ready for review December 3, 2025 12:11
@AlexGPlay AlexGPlay requested review from a team as code owners December 3, 2025 12:11
@elasticmachine
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Pinging @elastic/kibana-data-discovery (Team:DataDiscovery)

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@NicholasPeretti NicholasPeretti left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice refactor! Thank you for this ☺️ 🚀

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@jughosta jughosta left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, thanks!

@AlexGPlay AlexGPlay merged commit f7266e7 into elastic:main Dec 3, 2025
23 checks passed
@jughosta
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

jughosta commented Dec 3, 2025

Let's backport to 9.2 as it fails sometimes there too.

@AlexGPlay AlexGPlay added backport:version Backport to applied version labels v9.2.0 and removed backport:skip This PR does not require backporting labels Dec 4, 2025
@kibanamachine
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Starting backport for target branches: 9.2

https://github.com/elastic/kibana/actions/runs/19921697608

@kibanamachine
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Starting backport for target branches: 9.2

https://github.com/elastic/kibana/actions/runs/19921697525

@kibanamachine
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

💔 All backports failed

Status Branch Result
9.2 Backport failed because of merge conflicts

Manual backport

To create the backport manually run:

node scripts/backport --pr 245045

Questions ?

Please refer to the Backport tool documentation

1 similar comment
@kibanamachine
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

💔 All backports failed

Status Branch Result
9.2 Backport failed because of merge conflicts

Manual backport

To create the backport manually run:

node scripts/backport --pr 245045

Questions ?

Please refer to the Backport tool documentation

@AlexGPlay
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

💚 All backports created successfully

Status Branch Result
9.2

Note: Successful backport PRs will be merged automatically after passing CI.

Questions ?

Please refer to the Backport tool documentation

AlexGPlay added a commit to AlexGPlay/kibana that referenced this pull request Dec 4, 2025
## Summary

Closes elastic#234829

Right now we have the `should show the reset width button only for
absolute width columns, and allow resetting to default width` test that
is asserting 3 different things:
- When resetting the width of the time column from absolute it goes back
to the default
- When resetting the width of a column that isn't the time column from
absolute it goes back to the default
- A column without absolute width can't be reset

This means that we can split the test into 3 smaller and more focused
tests for each of those scenarios. This should help with the timeout as
we are no longer waiting for a big one.

### Checklist

Check the PR satisfies following conditions.

Reviewers should verify this PR satisfies this list as well.

- [x] [Unit or functional
tests](https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/kibana/master/development-tests.html)
were updated or added to match the most common scenarios
- [x] The PR description includes the appropriate Release Notes section,
and the correct `release_note:*` label is applied per the
[guidelines](https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/kibana/master/contributing.html#kibana-release-notes-process)
- [x] Review the [backport
guidelines](https://docs.google.com/document/d/1VyN5k91e5OVumlc0Gb9RPa3h1ewuPE705nRtioPiTvY/edit?usp=sharing)
and apply applicable `backport:*` labels.

(cherry picked from commit f7266e7)

# Conflicts:
#	src/platform/packages/shared/kbn-unified-data-table/src/components/data_table.test.tsx
@kibanamachine kibanamachine added the backport missing Added to PRs automatically when the are determined to be missing a backport. label Dec 5, 2025
@kibanamachine
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Looks like this PR has a backport PR but it still hasn't been merged. Please merge it ASAP to keep the branches relatively in sync.
cc: @AlexGPlay

AlexGPlay added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 5, 2025
…245200)

# Backport

This will backport the following commits from `main` to `9.2`:
- [[Unified Data Table] Split test into 3 smaller tests
(#245045)](#245045)

<!--- Backport version: 10.2.0 -->

### Questions ?
Please refer to the [Backport tool
documentation](https://github.com/sorenlouv/backport)

<!--BACKPORT [{"author":{"name":"Alejandro García
Parrondo","email":"31973472+AlexGPlay@users.noreply.github.com"},"sourceCommit":{"committedDate":"2025-12-03T15:25:03Z","message":"[Unified
Data Table] Split test into 3 smaller tests (#245045)\n\n##
Summary\n\nCloses
https://github.com/elastic/kibana/issues/234829\n\nRight now we have the
`should show the reset width button only for\nabsolute width columns,
and allow resetting to default width` test that\nis asserting 3
different things:\n- When resetting the width of the time column from
absolute it goes back\nto the default\n- When resetting the width of a
column that isn't the time column from\nabsolute it goes back to the
default\n- A column without absolute width can't be reset\n\nThis means
that we can split the test into 3 smaller and more focused\ntests for
each of those scenarios. This should help with the timeout as\nwe are no
longer waiting for a big one.\n\n\n### Checklist\n\nCheck the PR
satisfies following conditions. \n\nReviewers should verify this PR
satisfies this list as well.\n\n- [x] [Unit or
functional\ntests](https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/kibana/master/development-tests.html)\nwere
updated or added to match the most common scenarios\n- [x] The PR
description includes the appropriate Release Notes section,\nand the
correct `release_note:*` label is applied per
the\n[guidelines](https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/kibana/master/contributing.html#kibana-release-notes-process)\n-
[x] Review the
[backport\nguidelines](https://docs.google.com/document/d/1VyN5k91e5OVumlc0Gb9RPa3h1ewuPE705nRtioPiTvY/edit?usp=sharing)\nand
apply applicable `backport:*`
labels.","sha":"f7266e765f0eafdb5548fd1e2ac845b8dd5658fa","branchLabelMapping":{"^v9.3.0$":"main","^v(\\d+).(\\d+).\\d+$":"$1.$2"}},"sourcePullRequest":{"labels":["release_note:skip","Team:DataDiscovery","backport:version","v9.2.0","v9.3.0"],"title":"[Unified
Data Table] Split test into 3 smaller
tests","number":245045,"url":"https://github.com/elastic/kibana/pull/245045","mergeCommit":{"message":"[Unified
Data Table] Split test into 3 smaller tests (#245045)\n\n##
Summary\n\nCloses
https://github.com/elastic/kibana/issues/234829\n\nRight now we have the
`should show the reset width button only for\nabsolute width columns,
and allow resetting to default width` test that\nis asserting 3
different things:\n- When resetting the width of the time column from
absolute it goes back\nto the default\n- When resetting the width of a
column that isn't the time column from\nabsolute it goes back to the
default\n- A column without absolute width can't be reset\n\nThis means
that we can split the test into 3 smaller and more focused\ntests for
each of those scenarios. This should help with the timeout as\nwe are no
longer waiting for a big one.\n\n\n### Checklist\n\nCheck the PR
satisfies following conditions. \n\nReviewers should verify this PR
satisfies this list as well.\n\n- [x] [Unit or
functional\ntests](https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/kibana/master/development-tests.html)\nwere
updated or added to match the most common scenarios\n- [x] The PR
description includes the appropriate Release Notes section,\nand the
correct `release_note:*` label is applied per
the\n[guidelines](https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/kibana/master/contributing.html#kibana-release-notes-process)\n-
[x] Review the
[backport\nguidelines](https://docs.google.com/document/d/1VyN5k91e5OVumlc0Gb9RPa3h1ewuPE705nRtioPiTvY/edit?usp=sharing)\nand
apply applicable `backport:*`
labels.","sha":"f7266e765f0eafdb5548fd1e2ac845b8dd5658fa"}},"sourceBranch":"main","suggestedTargetBranches":["9.2"],"targetPullRequestStates":[{"branch":"9.2","label":"v9.2.0","branchLabelMappingKey":"^v(\\d+).(\\d+).\\d+$","isSourceBranch":false,"state":"NOT_CREATED"},{"branch":"main","label":"v9.3.0","branchLabelMappingKey":"^v9.3.0$","isSourceBranch":true,"state":"MERGED","url":"https://github.com/elastic/kibana/pull/245045","number":245045,"mergeCommit":{"message":"[Unified
Data Table] Split test into 3 smaller tests (#245045)\n\n##
Summary\n\nCloses
https://github.com/elastic/kibana/issues/234829\n\nRight now we have the
`should show the reset width button only for\nabsolute width columns,
and allow resetting to default width` test that\nis asserting 3
different things:\n- When resetting the width of the time column from
absolute it goes back\nto the default\n- When resetting the width of a
column that isn't the time column from\nabsolute it goes back to the
default\n- A column without absolute width can't be reset\n\nThis means
that we can split the test into 3 smaller and more focused\ntests for
each of those scenarios. This should help with the timeout as\nwe are no
longer waiting for a big one.\n\n\n### Checklist\n\nCheck the PR
satisfies following conditions. \n\nReviewers should verify this PR
satisfies this list as well.\n\n- [x] [Unit or
functional\ntests](https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/kibana/master/development-tests.html)\nwere
updated or added to match the most common scenarios\n- [x] The PR
description includes the appropriate Release Notes section,\nand the
correct `release_note:*` label is applied per
the\n[guidelines](https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/kibana/master/contributing.html#kibana-release-notes-process)\n-
[x] Review the
[backport\nguidelines](https://docs.google.com/document/d/1VyN5k91e5OVumlc0Gb9RPa3h1ewuPE705nRtioPiTvY/edit?usp=sharing)\nand
apply applicable `backport:*`
labels.","sha":"f7266e765f0eafdb5548fd1e2ac845b8dd5658fa"}}]}]
BACKPORT-->
@kibanamachine kibanamachine added v9.2.3 and removed backport missing Added to PRs automatically when the are determined to be missing a backport. labels Dec 5, 2025
JordanSh pushed a commit to JordanSh/kibana that referenced this pull request Dec 9, 2025
## Summary

Closes elastic#234829

Right now we have the `should show the reset width button only for
absolute width columns, and allow resetting to default width` test that
is asserting 3 different things:
- When resetting the width of the time column from absolute it goes back
to the default
- When resetting the width of a column that isn't the time column from
absolute it goes back to the default
- A column without absolute width can't be reset

This means that we can split the test into 3 smaller and more focused
tests for each of those scenarios. This should help with the timeout as
we are no longer waiting for a big one.


### Checklist

Check the PR satisfies following conditions. 

Reviewers should verify this PR satisfies this list as well.

- [x] [Unit or functional
tests](https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/kibana/master/development-tests.html)
were updated or added to match the most common scenarios
- [x] The PR description includes the appropriate Release Notes section,
and the correct `release_note:*` label is applied per the
[guidelines](https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/kibana/master/contributing.html#kibana-release-notes-process)
- [x] Review the [backport
guidelines](https://docs.google.com/document/d/1VyN5k91e5OVumlc0Gb9RPa3h1ewuPE705nRtioPiTvY/edit?usp=sharing)
and apply applicable `backport:*` labels.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

backport:version Backport to applied version labels release_note:skip Skip the PR/issue when compiling release notes Team:DataDiscovery Discover, search (data plugin and KQL), data views, saved searches. For ES|QL, use Team:ES|QL. t// v9.2.0 v9.2.3 v9.3.0

Projects

None yet

5 participants