-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.5k
New way of backporting to active branches using gh action #17551
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
It looks like this replaces setup for
|
@robbavey This list of active branches based on the Unified Release process. Yes, |
Will Once 7.x is released, I would expect that most of our backports would be targeted to |
No, we will replace that in the internal implementation, and consumers won't need to do much. In other words, we decided to change how we used Instead of using the declarative approach, we use the branches.json as the file to search for the current active branches and |
No. We, observability robots, are responsible for maintaining that file. We have been using for nearly three years so far in other places.
As I mentioned above, we will change that behaviour to skip |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thank you @v1v - sounds like once 9.0
is released, this will do what the previous implementation did with the added bonus of us not having to maintain the versions. Sounds good to me!
@Mergifyio backport 9.0 |
✅ Backports have been created
|
(cherry picked from commit 86042f8) # Conflicts: # .mergify.yml
Release notes
What does this PR do?
Adding new github workflow for creating backports to active branches.
Checklist