feat: Reusable workflow for multi-platform docker builds#73
Merged
Conversation
kgrubb
reviewed
Jun 16, 2026
kgrubb
approved these changes
Jun 16, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
Add opinionated reusable workflow to be used for multi-arch docker builds.
Core idea is to build with different runners per each target platform, use
outputs: push-by-digest=true,type=image,push=trueto push single-platform manifests and combine to a tagged manifest via:Workflow feats/nuances:
Also capable of building images without pushing which is usefulr for CI pipelines.
Also the hack is present in the workflow. Sometimes we need to inject Docker Secrets into the build to fetch non-public content (like dependencies), ideally we should not use any static secrets for any purposes. This principal imposes a problem, for example we need temporary GCP token to access the NPM registry hosted in GCP Artifact Registry, following approach is sub-optimal:
because:
outputswas not designed to pass sensitive data across multiple jobs.So current workaround is to add necessary steps to the workflow itself (false by default) and customize via inputs, for example, in order to pass a GCP token for Artifact registry:
In future other dynamic secrets will be added in a same manner.