Skip to content

docs: remove test environment#160

Merged
jo-elimu merged 1 commit intomainfrom
jo-elimu-patch-1
Mar 3, 2025
Merged

docs: remove test environment#160
jo-elimu merged 1 commit intomainfrom
jo-elimu-patch-1

Conversation

@jo-elimu
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@jo-elimu jo-elimu commented Mar 2, 2025

#156

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Updated the build variant details to now list only two modes.
    • Revised the server configuration information to reflect that both available modes use the production server.

@jo-elimu jo-elimu requested a review from a team as a code owner March 2, 2025 12:00
@coderabbitai
Copy link
Copy Markdown

coderabbitai bot commented Mar 2, 2025

Walkthrough

The pull request updates the project's documentation by modifying the build type descriptions in the README. The changes remove the qa_test build type, leaving only debug and release. Additionally, the default server configuration is changed so that both remaining build types now point to a production server instead of a test server.

Changes

File Change Summary
README.md Removed qa_test build type from the list; updated default server configuration to point both debug and release to production.

Possibly related PRs

  • qa_test removed #159: Removed the qa_test build type configuration in app/build.gradle, aligning with the changes made in the README.

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between e2fe687 and 877ffc4.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • README.md (1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (2)
  • GitHub Check: build (windows-latest, 21)
  • GitHub Check: build (windows-latest, 17)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
README.md (2)

56-59: Removed qa_test Build Type from Development Section

The updated section now clearly states that only two build types, debug and release, are available during development. This aligns well with the pull request’s objective of removing the test environment (previously represented by qa_test). Please ensure that any other internal or external documentation referencing the qa_test build type is updated accordingly.


60-61: Updated Default Server Configuration

The documentation now indicates that both the debug and release build types are pointing to the production server, as evidenced by the link to the production installation instructions. This clearly reflects the change to remove the test environment defaults.


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@jo-elimu jo-elimu merged commit e84868b into main Mar 3, 2025
6 checks passed
@jo-elimu jo-elimu deleted the jo-elimu-patch-1 branch March 3, 2025 05:59
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants