Skip to content

Conversation

@5c0
Copy link
Contributor

@5c0 5c0 commented Oct 14, 2025

Relates to

This PR addresses a TODO comment found in packages/client/src/components/agent-prism/IconButton.tsx. No issue is formally associated with this change.

Risks

Low. This change is a refactoring of a single UI component and all of its usages have been updated. The change is localized to the client-side presentation layer.

Background

What does this PR do?

This PR refactors the IconButton component to make its API more explicit and type-safe. It replaces the use of the generic children prop for passing icons with a dedicated and mandatory icon prop. This ensures that every IconButton is always instantiated with an icon component.

All existing usages of IconButton have been updated to conform to the new API, passing the appropriate lucide-react icon component to the new prop.

What kind of change is this?

Improvements (misc. changes to existing features)

Documentation changes needed?

My changes do not require a change to the project documentation.

Testing

Where should a reviewer start?

A good starting point is reviewing the changes in packages/client/src/components/agent-prism/IconButton.tsx to see the new component API.

After that, the modified call sites can be reviewed to see how the new API is used:

  • packages/client/src/components/agent-prism/CollapseAndExpandControls.tsx
  • packages/client/src/components/agent-prism/DetailsView/DetailsViewHeader.tsx
  • packages/client/src/components/agent-prism/DetailsView/DetailsViewInputOutputTab.tsx

Detailed testing steps

Automated tests are acceptable. The component tests for the client package should cover these changes.

A manual verification can also be done by running the client and navigating to pages where the IconButton is used (e.g., the agent details view) to ensure the copy and expand/collapse icons render and function correctly.

Refactors the IconButton component to accept a mandatory 'icon' prop instead of rendering children.

This change addresses a TODO comment and makes the component's API more explicit and type-safe, ensuring an icon is always provided.

All existing call sites for IconButton have been updated to use the new 'icon' prop, passing in the appropriate icons from lucide-react.
@graphite-app
Copy link

graphite-app bot commented Oct 14, 2025

How to use the Graphite Merge Queue

Add either label to this PR to merge it via the merge queue:

  • merge-queue - adds this PR to the back of the merge queue
  • merge-queue-hotfix - for urgent hot fixes, skip the queue and merge this PR next

You must have a Graphite account in order to use the merge queue. Sign up using this link.

An organization admin has enabled the Graphite Merge Queue in this repository.

Please do not merge from GitHub as this will restart CI on PRs being processed by the merge queue.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 14, 2025

Important

Review skipped

Auto reviews are disabled on this repository.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note

Other AI code review bot(s) detected

CodeRabbit has detected other AI code review bot(s) in this pull request and will avoid duplicating their findings in the review comments. This may lead to a less comprehensive review.

✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@wtfsayo wtfsayo requested a review from Copilot October 19, 2025 12:24
Copy link
Contributor

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull Request Overview

This PR refactors the IconButton component to use a dedicated icon prop instead of relying on the generic children prop, making the API more explicit and type-safe.

  • Replaced children prop with a mandatory icon prop of type ElementType
  • Added iconSizeClasses mapping to automatically size icons based on button size
  • Updated all usages across the codebase to pass icon components directly

Reviewed Changes

Copilot reviewed 4 out of 5 changed files in this pull request and generated 1 comment.

File Description
packages/client/src/components/agent-prism/IconButton.tsx Refactored component to accept icon prop instead of children, added icon size mapping
packages/client/src/components/agent-prism/DetailsView/DetailsViewInputOutputTab.tsx Updated CopyButton to pass icon component via icon prop
packages/client/src/components/agent-prism/DetailsView/DetailsViewHeader.tsx Updated copy button to pass icon component via icon prop
packages/client/src/components/agent-prism/CollapseAndExpandControls.tsx Updated expand/collapse buttons to pass icon components via icon prop

Tip: Customize your code reviews with copilot-instructions.md. Create the file or learn how to get started.

{...rest}
>
{children}
<Icon size={iconSizeClasses[size]} />
Copy link

Copilot AI Oct 19, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

[nitpick] The icon size is now controlled by the component, but consumers previously had control over icon sizing via className (e.g., 'size-3', 'size-3.5'). This change removes that flexibility. Consider whether the hardcoded size mapping accurately reflects the previous sizing, or if allowing className overrides on the icon would be beneficial.

Copilot uses AI. Check for mistakes.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant