Skip to content

Update correct Pygame library #328

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

ultimateownsz
Copy link

@ultimateownsz ultimateownsz commented Apr 17, 2025

Pygame-ce is a fork of pygame. It was created after some conflict that occurred that prevented developers from contributing to the main library. Pygame-ce is the one most commonly recommended.

Why do you think the link is worth adding on this list?
Please describe the answer here

Does this project has any License?
Please describe the answer here
https://www.gnu.org/licenses/lgpl-3.0.html

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Updated the "Engines and Frameworks" section to reference "PyGame-CE" with an improved description and updated link.

This updates the url and name of the Pygame library. The community version is actively being worked on and the old pygame library is not.
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Apr 17, 2025

Walkthrough

The README file was updated to replace the reference to the original "PyGame" project with "PyGame-CE" in the "Engines and Frameworks" section. The link was changed to the new project's documentation, and the description was expanded to clarify that PyGame-CE is a community edition, open-source, and built on SDL for multimedia applications such as games. No other changes were made.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
README.md Updated "Engines and Frameworks" section: replaced PyGame with PyGame-CE, updated link and description.

Poem

A README refreshed, a new link to see,
PyGame-CE hops in, as lively as can be!
Community-driven, with SDL at its core,
For multimedia fun, and games galore.
Rabbits rejoice, with code so bright—
Let’s build new worlds, from day to night!
🐇✨


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 4d80174 and 4958d5f.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • README.md (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • README.md

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
README.md (1)

314-314: Normalize branding and verify supplemental resources
The entry has been updated to point at Pygame‑CE’s documentation, which is great. A couple of follow‑ups:

  1. Officially, the project is branded as “pygame‑ce” (all lowercase) on PyPI and GitHub. Consider adjusting the Markdown link text to match ([pygame‑ce](…)) for consistency.
  2. The PR summary mentions adding a blog post demo for building web games with Pygame‑CE, PyScript, and itch.io, but I don’t see that resource in this README. Please verify whether that link needs to be included (and where) so the documentation aligns with the stated objectives.
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 53a7ea1 and 4d80174.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • README.md (1 hunks)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant