Open
Conversation
Author
|
I've just added - via a dedicated commit - the concept of metadata-driven install, as well as the related |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Elvish is a superlative shell, always surprising me with its excellent quality and minimalist flexibility - which is why I feel now the need for extending it with semver-based package versioning, at least for Git repositories, so as to be able to handle the evolution of software architectures over time.
The mechanics of the present pull request are thoroughly described in the README of my epm-plus project, which contains the very same code as the PR, plus a few lines to patch epm at runtime.
Please, find attached a suite of proof-of-concept tests: they are based on my velvet test framework and runner for Elvish, and can be run via the
verify.elvscript:from the Elvish project directory.