-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 97
caldav + carddav: Optimized handleMultiGet with GetCalendarObjects and GetAddressObjects #194
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
prasad83
wants to merge
15
commits into
emersion:master
Choose a base branch
from
prasad83:master
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
15 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
367bda2
caldav: multi-get optimization with Backend GetCalendarObjects
prasad83 cae54e7
carddav: multi-get optimization with Backend GetAddressObjects
prasad83 1ad9c6f
Updates server_test backend
prasad83 8b9e077
Updated multi-get lookup failure in caldav
prasad83 67d35e7
Updated carddav_test backend.
prasad83 74bbf33
Updated variable name
prasad83 3315b20
Updated carddav_test backend.
prasad83 41ff32b
carddav: Replaced GetAddressObject with GetAddressObjects
prasad83 7ab6113
caldav: Replaced GetCalendarObject with GetCalendarObjects
prasad83 78133ac
Merge branch 'emersion:master' into master
prasad83 c3547d4
caldav: Updated error handling with multi-get
prasad83 a3a6e60
carddav: Updated error handling with multi-get
prasad83 03d97fb
carddav: Fixed lookups to overcome for ...range pointer trap.
prasad83 66ddc6f
caldav: Fixed lookups to overcome for ...range pointer trap.
prasad83 7dd82b0
Merge branch 'master' into master
prasad83 File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Do we really need to build a lookup map? Can't we just iterate over the results?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is minor optimization (considering the objects could be more than 1000)
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm suggesting to replace the
multiget.Hrefsloop below when building responses with a loop overobjects.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@emersion - The
lookupsensures we can match each href to its object efficiently and preserve request order without nested loops. It also gracefully handles missing paths.This way, backend GetCalendarObjects or GetAddressObjects need to worry about the order of returned objects or missing those that are not found.