-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 451
chore: improve merge test #5861
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
❌ Your patch check has failed because the patch coverage (0.00%) is below the target coverage (60.00%). You can increase the patch coverage or adjust the target coverage. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #5861 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 65.41% 65.38% -0.03%
==========================================
Files 222 223 +1
Lines 35643 35645 +2
==========================================
- Hits 23315 23307 -8
- Misses 10882 10893 +11
+ Partials 1446 1445 -1 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
Signed-off-by: zirain <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: zirain <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: zirain <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: zirain <[email protected]>
for _, mergeType := range []egv1a1.MergeType{egv1a1.StrategicMerge, egv1a1.JSONMerge} { | ||
t.Run(fmt.Sprintf("%s/%s", mergeType, tc.name), func(t *testing.T) { | ||
got, err := Merge[*egv1a1.BackendTrafficPolicy](tc.original, tc.patch, mergeType) | ||
t.Run(fmt.Sprintf("%s/%s", mergeType, caseName), func(t *testing.T) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
testdata is currently flat, prefer current state
No description provided.