Skip to content

Conversation

@kathsherratt
Copy link
Contributor

  • I quite like the suggestion to use the SD instead of 95%CIs but not very attached to it and more than happy to switch back.
  • Updated figure caption hoping to clarify it shouldn't be interpreted as a between-model performance comparison.

@kathsherratt kathsherratt merged commit 094288f into main Mar 5, 2025
1 check passed
@kathsherratt kathsherratt deleted the figure-revisions branch March 5, 2025 12:26
@sbfnk
Copy link
Contributor

sbfnk commented Mar 5, 2025

I'm sorry, I meant to comment on this. I don't mind showing the SD but I also think that it's more useful to show the uncertainty of the mean estimate as opposed the whole spread of scores across times and locations - aside from my somewhat irrelevant personal preference I think this is how people will read it.

@kathsherratt
Copy link
Contributor Author

kathsherratt commented Mar 7, 2025

Fair enough, thanks.

(Reverted)

kathsherratt added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 7, 2025
@sbfnk sbfnk mentioned this pull request Mar 10, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants