refined: option labels and descriptions for archive and taxonomy scanning settings - #1215
Conversation
|
Caution Review failedThe pull request is closed. WalkthroughLabels and descriptions on the Accessibility Checker options page were renamed and reworded. The English source strings in the POT file were updated with these new texts and a refreshed timestamp. No code logic, control flow, or API changes. Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes Possibly related PRs
Poem
Tip 🔌 Remote MCP (Model Context Protocol) integration is now available!Pro plan users can now connect to remote MCP servers from the Integrations page. Connect with popular remote MCPs such as Notion and Linear to add more context to your reviews and chats. 📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro 💡 Knowledge Base configuration:
You can enable these sources in your CodeRabbit configuration. 📒 Files selected for processing (2)
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests
🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
SupportNeed help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR/Issue comments)Type Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull Request Overview
This PR refines the user interface text for archive and taxonomy scanning settings in the WordPress plugin options. The changes focus on making labels more concise and descriptions clearer for users.
Key changes:
- Simplified setting labels by removing "Enable" and "Scan All" prefixes
- Clarified descriptions to better explain the impact on scan behavior and performance
Reviewed Changes
Copilot reviewed 2 out of 2 changed files in this pull request and generated no comments.
| File | Description |
|---|---|
| includes/options-page.php | Updated setting labels and descriptions for archive and taxonomy scanning options |
| languages/accessibility-checker.pot | Updated translation strings to reflect the new labels and descriptions |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Summary of Changes
Hello @pattonwebz, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!
This pull request focuses on refining the user interface text for the archive and taxonomy scanning settings within the application. The changes aim to make the option labels more concise and the accompanying descriptions clearer, improving the overall user experience when configuring these scanning functionalities.
Highlights
- UI Text Refinement: Updated the labels for "Enable Archive Scanning" to "Archive Scanning" and "Scan All Taxonomy Terms" to "Taxonomy Scanning" for improved conciseness.
- Clarity in Descriptions: Revised the descriptive text for both archive and taxonomy scanning options to provide clearer explanations of their functionality and implications, such as increased scan time or URL additions.
Using Gemini Code Assist
The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.
Invoking Gemini
You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.
| Feature | Command | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Code Review | /gemini review |
Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state. |
| Pull Request Summary | /gemini summary |
Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state. |
| Comment | @gemini-code-assist | Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments. |
| Help | /gemini help |
Displays a list of available commands. |
Customization
To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.
Limitations & Feedback
Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.
You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.
Footnotes
-
Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request refines the labels and descriptions for the archive and taxonomy scanning settings. The labels are now more concise, changing from 'Enable Archive Scanning' to 'Archive Scanning' and 'Scan All Taxonomy Terms' to 'Taxonomy Scanning'. The descriptions have also been updated for better clarity and to more accurately describe the impact of enabling these settings. The translation template file has been correctly updated to reflect these changes. Overall, this is a good set of improvements to the user interface text. I have no further recommendations.
Summary by CodeRabbit