refactor: separate process definitions from instance references

[frodehk]

Summary

• Separates process instance names, instance references, and definition references.
• Renames reusable sections to PROCESS_UNIT_DEFINITIONS and PROCESS_PIPELINE_DEFINITIONS.
• Renames pipeline ITEMS to PROCESS_UNITS.
• Requires explicit pipeline instance names.
• Adds ProcessUnitResolver and resolver test coverage.

Motivation

This is a first step toward resolving YAML references before domain mapping, with reusable definitions and local instances represented explicitly.

---

Type of Work

• Patch: X.Y.Z+1. NEGLIGIBLE visible changes, does not change input or output - OR changes behaviour. Use chore:, refactor: etc
• Minor: X.Y+1.Z. Minor changes, might ADD new input (YAML), or other backwards-compatible changes. Use feat:, fix:
• Major: X+1.Y.Z. Major and most likely BREAKING changes, wo. backwards compatibility, or removing temporary backwards compatibility functionality. Use ! or BREAKING:.

See here (internal): https://github.com/equinor/ecalc-internal/discussions/1044

Have you remembered and considered?

• IF FEAT: I have remembered to update documentation
• IF FIX OR FEAT: I have remembered to update manual changelog (docs/drafts/next.draft.md)
• IF BREAKING: I have remembered to update migration guide (docs/docs/migration_guides/)
• IF BREAKING: I have committed with BREAKING: in footer or ! in header
• I have added tests (if not, comment why)
• I have used conventional commits syntax (if you squash, make sure that conventional commit is used)
• I have included the Github issue nr in the footer!

What is this PR all about?

What else did you consider?

Between the lines?

[tj098895]

isnt this conflicting with #1716 ? Or is the intent to build on top of it?

[frodehk]

isnt this conflicting with #1716 ? Or is the intent to build on top of it?

Yes it is quite similar, we agreed to upload both branches to compare. We are in dialogue:-)

There are some few differences, e.g. handling of pipeline instances and how pipeline objects can be re-used.

[frodehk]

replaced by: #1716