Fix typos in Reference Manual - #10918
Conversation
CT Test Results 1 files 11 suites 3m 3s ⏱️ Results for commit 83ce6b3. ♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results. To speed up review, make sure that you have read Contributing to Erlang/OTP and that all checks pass. See the TESTING and DEVELOPMENT HowTo guides for details about how to run test locally. Artifacts
// Erlang/OTP Github Action Bot |
bjorng
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Overall looks good to me. I have a few suggestions for further improvements.
|
Our policy is generally to use American spelling, but we have the Because of the size of this pull request, do any changes as additional commits. I will ask you to squash later when I've reviewed the changes. |
|
@bjorng I applied the suggestions which I think are indisputable and left the ones on which I have questions for later 😉 |
Not as part of this PR, I think.
Sure 👍 |
3b9f1a8 to
d53dcd9
Compare
|
@bjorng I applied your suggestions in the last commit. |
Co-authored-by: Maria Scott <maria-12648430@hnc-agency.org>
d53dcd9 to
83ce6b3
Compare
|
Thanks for your pull request. |
This PR fixes some typos and grammar issues, and also rewords some phrases for simplification and/or clarification, in the Reference Manual.
One thing we noticed while doing this (but didn't change) is that there are mixed usages of british and american english (eg "behaviour" vs "behavior"), usually in the prose. Also, there are some spellings that, while not wrong, have fallen out of favor (eg "run-time" vs "runtime").
This PR slightly clashes with #10914, bad timing... Whatever PR gets merged first, the other will probably have to be adapted.