feat(receipts): archive verification evidence before retention pruning - #598
Merged
Conversation
Verification retention kept the newest 50 run directories and deleted older receipt evidence, which conflicts with append-only audit storage. Add an archival path that preserves receipt evidence before local pruning runs, carrying integrity metadata and schema version through the archive, and keep the local retention limit configurable. Closes #565 Co-authored-by: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
Important Review skippedAuto reviews are limited based on label configuration. 🏷️ Required labels (at least one) (1)
Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the ⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Repository: escoffier-labs/coderabbit/.coderabbit.yaml Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Plus Run ID: You can disable this status message by setting the Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:
✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
Co-Authored-By: Codex <codex@openai.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Closes #565
Summary
Verification retention kept the newest 50 run directories and deleted older receipt evidence, which conflicts with append-only audit storage. This adds an archival path that preserves receipt evidence before local pruning runs.
Provenance
Produced by
brigade run --worker k3 --worktree, run20260727-211319-f7ca4eae. That run is recorded asfaileddue to the isolation-guard misclassification filed as #597; the worker rebased its own worktree ontoorigin/main, which is why this patch applies to main cleanly.Verification
brigade work verify runontests/test_work_cmd_verification.py tests/test_config.py, receipt20260727-215705-work-verify-dc6fa9: 137 passed, 1 failed.The single failure is
test_verify_reused_receipt_stamps_harness_session_from_outer_env_prefix, which fails identically on unpatchedorigin/mainin a worktree (No module named brigadein a spawned subprocess, because a worktree lacks the editable install). It is pre-existing and environmental, not introduced here. CI runs against a proper install and should be the deciding gate.