chore: bump react to v19.1
#108
Open
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
✅ Deploy Preview for eslint-code-explorer ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify project configuration. |
snitin315
approved these changes
May 20, 2025
snitin315
added
the
accepted
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Prerequisites checklist
What is the purpose of this pull request?
What changes did you make? (Give an overview)
Hello,
In this PR, I've bumped React to
v19.1along with other related dependencies.This PR includes a few notable major version updates:
reactandreact-domReact v19 introduces some changes, but they don’t affect our current implementation, as React still supports older APIs for backward compatibility.
react-resizable-panelsAccording to the v3.0.0 release notes, there are no significant breaking changes that impact our usage.
Related Issues
Is there anything you'd like reviewers to focus on?