chore: simplify configuration files #270
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
✅ Deploy Preview for eslint-code-explorer ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify project configuration. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
This PR simplifies various configuration files by removing unnecessary fields and streamlining exports. The changes aim to reduce configuration complexity while maintaining functionality.
- Simplified
postcss.config.jsto use direct export instead of intermediate variable - Removed
versionfield frompackage.jsonandpackage-lock.json(appropriate for private packages) - Updated
tailwind.config.jscontent paths to remove non-existent directories - Reorganized
eslint.config.jsby movingglobalIgnoresto the beginning and attempting to simplify config spreading
Reviewed changes
Copilot reviewed 3 out of 5 changed files in this pull request and generated 2 comments.
Show a summary per file
| File | Description |
|---|---|
| eslint.config.js | Moved globalIgnores to beginning, removed spread operator for TypeScript ESLint config, and removed react-hooks plugin registration |
| package.json | Removed version field and reordered file extensions in lint-staged config |
| package-lock.json | Removed version field to match package.json changes |
| postcss.config.js | Simplified to direct export without intermediate variable assignment |
| tailwind.config.js | Updated content paths to only include ./src/**/*.{ts,tsx}, removing non-existent directories |
💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.
DMartens
reviewed
Dec 16, 2025
DMartens
reviewed
Dec 16, 2025
amareshsm
added
the
accepted
amareshsm
approved these changes
Dec 17, 2025
Member
amareshsm
left a comment
amareshsm
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
LGTM. Thanks. Leaving it open for DMartens's review.
DMartens
approved these changes
Dec 17, 2025
Contributor
DMartens
left a comment
DMartens
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Changes LGTM, good catches.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Prerequisites checklist
What is the purpose of this pull request?
In this PR, I've simplified the configuration files as follows:
eslint.config.js: By using thedefineConfighelper, the spread (...) fortseslint.configs.recommendedwas unnecessary, so I removed it. I also removed theplugins.react-hooksfield since there are noreact-hooksoverrides inrules.package.json: Sincecode-exploreris not an npm-published package, theversionfield was unnecessary, so I removed it.postcss.config.js: Simplified to use a default export directly, removing the need for a separate variable assignment.tailwind.config.js: Removed the root-levelpages,components, andappentries because those directories do not exist.What changes did you make? (Give an overview)
In this PR, I've simplified the configuration files.
Related Issues
N/A
Is there anything you'd like reviewers to focus on?
N/A