Skip to content

[Snyk] Security upgrade webpack from 5.94.0 to 5.98.0#352

Open
thejoeejoee wants to merge 1 commit intodevelopfrom
snyk-fix-9daaf314be117eba129cd8da16893c7f
Open

[Snyk] Security upgrade webpack from 5.94.0 to 5.98.0#352
thejoeejoee wants to merge 1 commit intodevelopfrom
snyk-fix-9daaf314be117eba129cd8da16893c7f

Conversation

@thejoeejoee
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

snyk-top-banner

Snyk has created this PR to fix 1 vulnerabilities in the yarn dependencies of this project.

Snyk changed the following file(s):

  • webpack/package.json
  • webpack/yarn.lock

Note for zero-installs users

If you are using the Yarn feature zero-installs that was introduced in Yarn V2, note that this PR does not update the .yarn/cache/ directory meaning this code cannot be pulled and immediately developed on as one would expect for a zero-install project - you will need to run yarn to update the contents of the ./yarn/cache directory.
If you are not using zero-install you can ignore this as your flow should likely be unchanged.

Vulnerabilities that will be fixed with an upgrade:

Issue Score
high severity Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS)
SNYK-JS-AJV-15274295
  803  

Important

  • Check the changes in this PR to ensure they won't cause issues with your project.
  • Max score is 1000. Note that the real score may have changed since the PR was raised.
  • This PR was automatically created by Snyk using the credentials of a real user.

Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open fix PRs.

For more information:
🧐 View latest project report
📜 Customise PR templates
🛠 Adjust project settings
📚 Read about Snyk's upgrade logic


Learn how to fix vulnerabilities with free interactive lessons:

🦉 Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS)

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Copy Markdown

coderabbitai bot commented Feb 16, 2026

Important

Review skipped

Ignore keyword(s) in the title.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:

  • 🔍 Trigger review
✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch snyk-fix-9daaf314be117eba129cd8da16893c7f

Tip

Issue Planner is now in beta. Read the docs and try it out! Share your feedback on Discord.


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

Updates the webpack/ frontend build package dependencies to remediate a Snyk-reported vulnerability by upgrading webpack and its transitive dependency graph.

Changes:

  • Bump webpack dependency in webpack/package.json from ^5.94.0 to ^5.98.0.
  • Regenerate webpack/yarn.lock, updating webpack’s resolved version and several related transitive packages (e.g., schema-utils, terser-webpack-plugin, @webassemblyjs/*).

Reviewed changes

Copilot reviewed 1 out of 2 changed files in this pull request and generated 1 comment.

File Description
webpack/package.json Updates the declared webpack semver range to a newer minimum version.
webpack/yarn.lock Updates the resolved dependency tree for webpack and related tooling packages.

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

You can also share your feedback on Copilot code review. Take the survey.

"tailwindcss": "^3.4.11",
"tom-select": "^2.1.0",
"webpack": "^5.94.0",
"webpack": "^5.98.0",
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants