Skip to content

Conversation

@peter-marcisovsky
Copy link
Collaborator

Description

Running esp-idf examples with overridden components on target runners.

Related

Testing


Checklist

Before submitting a Pull Request, please ensure the following:

  • 🚨 This PR does not introduce breaking changes.
  • All CI checks (GH Actions) pass.
  • Documentation is updated as needed.
  • Tests are updated or added as necessary.
  • Code is well-commented, especially in complex areas.
  • Git history is clean — commits are squashed to the minimum necessary.

@peter-marcisovsky peter-marcisovsky self-assigned this Nov 26, 2025
@peter-marcisovsky peter-marcisovsky added Status: In Progress Issue is being worked on CI CI related PR labels Nov 26, 2025
@peter-marcisovsky peter-marcisovsky force-pushed the ci/target_run_idf_examples branch from 1d4a437 to a1d7fe5 Compare November 27, 2025 10:18
@peter-marcisovsky peter-marcisovsky force-pushed the ci/target_run_idf_examples branch from a1d7fe5 to 73b88d9 Compare November 27, 2025 11:44
@peter-marcisovsky
Copy link
Collaborator Author

peter-marcisovsky commented Nov 27, 2025

The CI workflow correctly accessed esp32p4 usb_host_flash_disk runners, but there is the error about esp32p4 ECO versions mismatch on the esp-idf Latest :

esptool.util.FatalError: '/opt/esp/idf/examples/peripherals/usb/host/usb_host_lib/build_esp32p4_default/bootloader/bootloader.bin' requires chip revision in range [v3.0 - v3.99] (this chip is revision v1.0). Use the force argument to flash anyway.

Build is for esp32p4 ECO5, the runners are not ECO5.
Disabling the esp32p4 usb_host_flash_disk run for esp-idf latest until the new runners are avaliable.

@peter-marcisovsky peter-marcisovsky force-pushed the ci/target_run_idf_examples branch from bf26f0a to 44dbe6c Compare November 27, 2025 15:53
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

CI CI related PR Status: In Progress Issue is being worked on

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants