-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 10.1k
Compaction hash #18103
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Compaction hash #18103
Conversation
Skipping CI for Draft Pull Request. |
Signed-off-by: Marek Siarkowicz <[email protected]>
588c885
to
c87d197
Compare
Maybe I lack context on this, but isn't compaction is schedued in the store fifo queue so there are no concurrent compactions in theory. Line 263 in eb9bfaa
Is it a correct understanding? |
From backend perspective yes, I meant from client perspective they can schedule multiple requests. They will be put into job queue and executed consecutively. |
@serathius: The following tests failed, say
Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Please help us cut down on flakes by linking to an open issue when you hit one in your PR. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed after 21 days if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions. |
Found a bug in compaction hash consistency check when there are multiple concurrent compaction it discards hashes from them.
Need to add a test.