-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 10.1k
adt: add tests for IntervalTree.Find() #19801
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
adt: add tests for IntervalTree.Find() #19801
Conversation
Signed-off-by: redwrasse <[email protected]>
Hi @redwrasse. Thanks for your PR. I'm waiting for a etcd-io member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the I understand the commands that are listed here. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
pkg/adt/interval_tree_test.go
Outdated
func TestIntervalTreeFind(t *testing.T) { | ||
ivt := NewIntervalTree() | ||
ivl1 := NewInt64Interval(3, 6) | ||
assert.Nilf(t, ivt.Find(ivl1), "find expected nil on empty tree") | ||
ivt.Insert(ivl1, 123) | ||
assert.Equalf(t, ivl1, ivt.Find(ivl1).Ivl, "find expected to return exact-matched interval") | ||
ivl2 := NewInt64Interval(3, 7) | ||
assert.Nilf(t, ivt.Find(ivl2), "find expected nil on single-matched endpoint") | ||
} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Was looking for something more extensive. Quick prompt to ML gave me the following results:
func TestIntervalTreeFind(t *testing.T) {
t.Run("Basic Find Operations", func(t *testing.T) {
ivt := NewIntervalTree()
ivl1 := NewInt64Interval(3, 6)
val1 := 123
// 1. Find on empty tree
assert.Nil(t, ivt.Find(ivl1), "Find on empty tree should return nil")
// 2. Insert and find exact match
ivt.Insert(ivl1, val1)
foundNode := ivt.Find(ivl1)
assert.NotNil(t, foundNode, "Find should return the inserted interval")
if foundNode != nil {
assert.Equal(t, ivl1, foundNode.Ivl, "Found interval should match the inserted interval")
assert.Equal(t, val1, foundNode.Val, "Found value should match the inserted value")
}
// 3. Find non-existent interval (overlapping start, different end)
ivl2 := NewInt64Interval(3, 7)
assert.Nil(t, ivt.Find(ivl2), "Find should return nil for an interval not exactly matching (different end)")
// 4. Find non-existent interval (overlapping end, different start)
ivl3 := NewInt64Interval(2, 6)
assert.Nil(t, ivt.Find(ivl3), "Find should return nil for an interval not exactly matching (different start)")
// 5. Find non-existent interval (completely different)
ivl4 := NewInt64Interval(10, 20)
assert.Nil(t, ivt.Find(ivl4), "Find should return nil for a completely different interval")
// 6. Insert another interval and find both
ivl5 := NewInt64Interval(10, 15)
val5 := 456
ivt.Insert(ivl5, val5)
foundNode1 := ivt.Find(ivl1)
assert.NotNil(t, foundNode1)
if foundNode1 != nil {
assert.Equal(t, ivl1, foundNode1.Ivl)
assert.Equal(t, val1, foundNode1.Val)
}
foundNode5 := ivt.Find(ivl5)
assert.NotNil(t, foundNode5)
if foundNode5 != nil {
assert.Equal(t, ivl5, foundNode5.Ivl)
assert.Equal(t, val5, foundNode5.Val)
}
})
t.Run("Find After Deletion", func(t *testing.T) {
ivt := NewIntervalTree()
ivlA := NewInt64Interval(1, 5)
valA := "A"
ivlB := NewInt64Interval(6, 10)
valB := "B"
ivt.Insert(ivlA, valA)
ivt.Insert(ivlB, valB)
assert.NotNil(t, ivt.Find(ivlA), "Should find ivlA before deletion")
assert.NotNil(t, ivt.Find(ivlB), "Should find ivlB before deletion")
deleted := ivt.Delete(ivlA)
assert.True(t, deleted, "Delete should return true for an existing interval")
assert.Nil(t, ivt.Find(ivlA), "Should not find ivlA after deletion")
assert.NotNil(t, ivt.Find(ivlB), "Should still find ivlB after deleting ivlA")
deleted = ivt.Delete(NewInt64Interval(100, 200)) // Non-existent
assert.False(t, deleted, "Delete should return false for a non-existing interval")
})
t.Run("Find with StringComparable", func(t *testing.T) {
ivt := NewIntervalTree()
sivl1 := NewStringInterval("apple", "banana")
sval1 := "fruit1"
assert.Nil(t, ivt.Find(sivl1), "Find on empty string tree should return nil")
ivt.Insert(sivl1, sval1)
foundNode := ivt.Find(sivl1)
assert.NotNil(t, foundNode, "Find should return the inserted string interval")
if foundNode != nil {
assert.Equal(t, sivl1, foundNode.Ivl)
assert.Equal(t, sval1, foundNode.Val)
}
sivl2 := NewStringInterval("apple", "cherry") // Different end
assert.Nil(t, ivt.Find(sivl2), "Find should return nil for a non-exact string interval")
})
t.Run("Find with overlapping but not identical intervals", func(t *testing.T) {
ivt := NewIntervalTree()
ivlBase := NewInt64Interval(5, 10)
valBase := "base"
ivt.Insert(ivlBase, valBase)
// Test cases that overlap but are not identical
testCases := []struct {
name string
interval Interval
}{
{"Subset", NewInt64Interval(6, 9)},
{"Superset", NewInt64Interval(4, 11)},
{"OverlapLeft", NewInt64Interval(3, 7)},
{"OverlapRight", NewInt64Interval(8, 12)},
{"TouchesBegin", NewInt64Interval(3, 5)}, // Does not overlap [5,10)
{"TouchesEnd", NewInt64Interval(10, 12)}, // Does not overlap [5,10)
}
for _, tc := range testCases {
t.Run(tc.name, func(t *testing.T) {
assert.Nil(t, ivt.Find(tc.interval), "Find(%v) should be nil as it's not an exact match for %v", tc.interval, ivlBase)
})
}
// Ensure the base interval is still findable
foundNode := ivt.Find(ivlBase)
assert.NotNil(t, foundNode)
if foundNode != nil {
assert.Equal(t, ivlBase, foundNode.Ivl)
}
})
}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ok I've expanded TestIntervalTreeFind
with a couple workflows along the above code sample. Also checking Find
is nil after Delete
in TestIntervalTreeRandom
.
Let me know if there's more specific cases I should include. Trying to keep the test style +coverage consistent with the rest of interval_tree_test.go
.
Signed-off-by: redwrasse <[email protected]>
/ok-to-test |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: redwrasse, serathius The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
/retest |
@redwrasse: The following test failed, say
Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Please help us cut down on flakes by linking to an open issue when you hit one in your PR. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
Adds tests for
IntervalTree.Find()
, following up on #19768 (comment) as part of #19769.cc @serathius