Skip to content

client: Better error handling in Watcher.Close() #19935

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

Jille
Copy link
Contributor

@Jille Jille commented May 13, 2025

The previous implementation might've ignored a real error if the last error happened to be context.Cancelled.

While we're at it, might as well use the new errors.Join() to actually return all errors.

The previous implementation might've ignored a real error if the last
error happened to be context.Cancelled.

While we're at it, might as well use the new errors.Join() to actually
return all errors.

Signed-off-by: Jille Timmermans <[email protected]>
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: Jille
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign ahrtr for approval. For more information see the Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link

Hi @Jille. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a etcd-io member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@Jille
Copy link
Contributor Author

Jille commented May 13, 2025

Hmm, I just realized errors.Join() will always wrap the error. Do we care that the return value might have a layer of wrapping?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants