Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Updating BICO token address on optimism #1024

Open
wants to merge 6 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

tomarsachin2271
Copy link
Contributor

Updating BICO token address on optimism.

Tests

Additional context

Metadata

@tomarsachin2271 tomarsachin2271 requested review from wbnns and a team as code owners December 13, 2024 11:39
@wbnns wbnns added the op PR require review from op team label Dec 17, 2024
@nickbalestra
Copy link
Contributor

Hey @tomarsachin2271 - Sorry for the belated reply on this, I see there are some conflict as there have been some addition to this token in the meanwhile, would you be able to fix conflicts on this PR or close if not relevant anymore?

Copy link
Contributor

mergify bot commented Feb 26, 2025

Hey @tomarsachin2271! This PR has merge conflicts. Please fix them before continuing review.

@mergify mergify bot added the conflict label Feb 26, 2025
@mergify mergify bot removed the conflict label Mar 3, 2025
@tomarsachin2271
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hey @tomarsachin2271 - Sorry for the belated reply on this, I see there are some conflict as there have been some addition to this token in the meanwhile, would you be able to fix conflicts on this PR or close if not relevant anymore?

Hey i've resolved the merge conflicts. In other PR BICO token address was wrongly added on unichain by someone else, i've overridden those changes while resolving merge conflicts.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
op PR require review from op team waiting-for-pr-author-response
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants