Skip to content

Conversation

@Snezhkko
Copy link
Contributor

Standardized the field naming for the unstable block reference to align with consensus-spec conventions and remove internal inconsistencies. The prose previously introduced a single-letter field u while the pseudocode used block.unstable; single-letter fields are atypical in the consensus specs and the value stored is a block root, so the descriptive name unstable_root is preferable. Updated Protocol Changes item 3 to use unstable_root consistently and corrected the pseudocode to set block.unstable_root = None, ensuring the name, semantics, and assignment target match throughout the document.

@Snezhkko Snezhkko requested a review from eth-bot as a code owner November 24, 2025 17:03
@github-actions github-actions bot added c-update Modifies an existing proposal s-draft This EIP is a Draft t-core labels Nov 24, 2025
@eth-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

eth-bot commented Nov 24, 2025

File EIPS/eip-7942.md

Requires 1 more reviewers from @Mart1i1n

@eth-bot eth-bot added the a-review Waiting on author to review label Nov 24, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

a-review Waiting on author to review c-update Modifies an existing proposal s-draft This EIP is a Draft t-core

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants