Add EIP: Algorithmic Transaction Wrapper

[SirSpudlington]

This EIP introduces a new wrapper type transaction to allow for alternative signature algorithms to sign off on an ethereum transactions.

[eth-bot]

File EIPS/eip-7932.md

Requires 1 more reviewers from @g11tech, @lightclient, @SamWilsn

[jochem-brouwer]

I like the idea to already think about how we can plugin new signature schemes but I am not sure if this is the "best" way to do it. I think a more cleaner approach would be to already have this feature in the transactions themselves (so the signing is a "module" and can either take the form of secp256k1 or something new). But, this is obviously not possible so we need another mechanism to swap it out for something else and this is already a good start 😄 👍

[SirSpudlington]

I think a more cleaner approach would be to already have this feature in the transactions themselves (so the signing is a "module" and can either take the form of secp256k1 or something new)

I completely agree, it would be nicer to have signing modules embedded in transactions, but as you said, it would break backwards compatibility in almost every way.

[bomanaps]

Lastly penalty calculation adds gas before transaction processing, but how do you clarify how this interacts with user-specified gas limits and transaction fee structures?

[github-actions]

The commit e3d3a5c (as a parent of 5d39406) contains errors.
Please inspect the Run Summary for details.