Skip to content

Conversation

@LouisTsai-Csie
Copy link
Collaborator

@LouisTsai-Csie LouisTsai-Csie commented Jun 2, 2025

πŸ—’οΈ Description

Add a JUMPI-intensive operation for ZKVm as test case.

Currently

πŸ”— Related Issues

Update issue #1690

βœ… Checklist

  • All: Set appropriate labels for the changes.
  • All: Added an entry to CHANGELOG.md.
  • Tests: Included the type and version of evm t8n tool used to locally execute test cases: e.g., ref with commit hash or geth 1.13.1-stable-3f40e65.
  • Tests: Ran mkdocs serve locally and verified the auto-generated docs for new tests in the Test Case Reference are correctly formatted.

@kevaundray
Copy link
Contributor

CC either @jsign @jochem-brouwer @chfast

Copy link
Member

@jochem-brouwer jochem-brouwer left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Agree with the comments from @chfast, also have a small style suggestion, plus a suggestion for a test where the JUMPI performs the jump (instead of "falling through" and thus not performing the jump).

@LouisTsai-Csie LouisTsai-Csie marked this pull request as ready for review June 3, 2025 14:52
@LouisTsai-Csie LouisTsai-Csie requested a review from chfast June 3, 2025 15:28
Copy link
Member

@jochem-brouwer jochem-brouwer left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Left some extra information and some comments, hope it is helpful πŸ˜„ πŸ‘

@LouisTsai-Csie LouisTsai-Csie self-assigned this Jun 16, 2025
@LouisTsai-Csie
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@jochem-brouwer Thank you so much for the explanation, it really helped me understand the inner workings of the test better. I’ve updated accordingly, and this PR is now ready for review. It would be great if you could take another look. Thanks again!

Copy link
Member

@jochem-brouwer jochem-brouwer left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you so much for the explanation, it really helped me understand the inner workings of the test better.

Love that it was so helpful πŸ˜„ πŸ‘ Always happy to help πŸ˜„

I left two small comments for some tiny improvements πŸ‘

@LouisTsai-Csie
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@jochem-brouwer Thanks for the review, update accordingly!

@spencer-tb spencer-tb changed the title feat(zkevm): add zkevm jumpi-intense test case feat(benchmark): add jumpi-intense test case Jul 1, 2025
@marioevz
Copy link
Member

marioevz commented Jul 1, 2025

#1804 got merged! Please rebase the branch and move the tests to the appropriate folder.

Copy link
Member

@marioevz marioevz left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM! Just a couple of comments, a rebase to main due to conflicts, and then we can merge.

@marioevz marioevz force-pushed the feat/add-zkevm-jumpi branch from dbd8af9 to 23be0d8 Compare July 21, 2025 17:59
@marioevz marioevz merged commit 7f1a99f into ethereum:main Jul 21, 2025
14 checks passed
kclowes pushed a commit to kclowes/execution-spec-tests that referenced this pull request Oct 20, 2025
* feat: add zkevm jumpi-intense op

* refactor: update jumpi fallthrough case

* feat(tests): add jumpi intensive contract test

* chore: fix typo

* refactor: optimize jumpi-intensive test case

* refactor(tests): replace hardcoded value with fork specific variable

* Apply suggestions from code review

---------

Co-authored-by: Mario Vega <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

feature:benchmark feature:zkevm scope:tests Scope: Changes EL client test cases in `./tests` type:feat type: Feature

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants