Skip to content

fix docs for yaml code highlight - #257

Merged
slashburygin merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
docs_yaml_code_fix
Mar 17, 2026
Merged

fix docs for yaml code highlight#257
slashburygin merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
docs_yaml_code_fix

Conversation

@slashburygin

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

No description provided.

@slashburygin
slashburygin requested a review from gmelikov March 17, 2026 13:56
@gemini-code-assist

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary of Changes

Hello, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request addresses a minor but important documentation formatting issue. It improves the readability and presentation of a YAML code example within the load balancer documentation, ensuring that code blocks are rendered correctly and consistently.

Highlights

  • Documentation Formatting: Corrected the display of a YAML code block in docs/network/load_balancer.md by removing an extra blank line, ensuring proper rendering.
Changelog
  • docs/network/load_balancer.md
    • Removed an extraneous blank line before a YAML code block to fix its rendering.
Activity
  • No specific activity (comments, reviews, etc.) has been recorded for this pull request yet.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for GitHub and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request corrects the markdown syntax for a YAML code block in docs/network/load_balancer.md to enable proper syntax highlighting. The change is correct and I have no further comments.

@slashburygin
slashburygin merged commit 9ee65e6 into master Mar 17, 2026
5 checks passed
@akremenetsky
akremenetsky deleted the docs_yaml_code_fix branch March 17, 2026 14:15
atin65536 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 21, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants