-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
perf(composeMatrix): 25% improv by restoring v5 implementation #9851
Merged
Merged
Changes from 2 commits
Commits
Show all changes
7 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
d7891c0
perf(composeMatrix): restore v5 implementation
jiayihu 5d65ab0
Use consistent naming
jiayihu d514fdb
Fix test error
jiayihu 5280921
benchmark
asturur 8eda3b4
a spread less
asturur a9d7d14
changelog
asturur 65013aa
Merge branch 'master' into perf/compose-matrix
asturur File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
i m sure at some point we were checking for scale !== 1 and flip thruty to also do this.
I m not sure is worth to create it rather than returning the iMatrix as a reference and then check by strict equality.
calcOwnMatrix has been split for reusal across fabric but maybe was a bad idea, it was good as a code block doing its thing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I thought about that but it's dangerous in fabric returning the same reference, as the
iMatrix
array could be mutated with terrible consequencesThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
iMatrix is frozen and will throw if you try to mutate it, we can't return it
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
but maybe it is quicker to create it than to clone it
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We don't mutate matrix we always create new i don't see any issue with returning iMatrix when necessary. but anyway this PR is a revert basically, so is fine as it is it does not need more changes apart the code comments