Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fit model instead of mocking out model fitting in test_botorch_moo_defaults.FrontierEvaluatorTest #3241

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

esantorella
Copy link
Contributor

Summary:

  • Fit a model in which fitting had been mocked out before
  • Move some logic out of the setUp so that we don't fit a model in tests where it isn't needed
  • In test_pareto_frontier_raise_error_when_missing_data, use an unfit model

Differential Revision: D68214262

@facebook-github-bot facebook-github-bot added the CLA Signed Do not delete this pull request or issue due to inactivity. label Jan 15, 2025
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D68214262

esantorella added a commit to esantorella/Ax that referenced this pull request Jan 16, 2025
…faults.FrontierEvaluatorTest (facebook#3241)

Summary:

* Fit a model in which fitting had been mocked out before
* Move some logic out of the `setUp` so that we don't fit a model in tests where it isn't needed
* In `test_pareto_frontier_raise_error_when_missing_data`, use an unfit model

Reviewed By: saitcakmak

Differential Revision: D68214262
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D68214262

esantorella added a commit to esantorella/Ax that referenced this pull request Jan 17, 2025
…faults.FrontierEvaluatorTest (facebook#3241)

Summary:

* Fit a model in which fitting had been mocked out before
* Move some logic out of the `setUp` so that we don't fit a model in tests where it isn't needed
* In `test_pareto_frontier_raise_error_when_missing_data`, use an unfit model

Reviewed By: saitcakmak

Differential Revision: D68214262
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D68214262

…faults.FrontierEvaluatorTest (facebook#3241)

Summary:

* Fit a model in which fitting had been mocked out before
* Move some logic out of the `setUp` so that we don't fit a model in tests where it isn't needed
* In `test_pareto_frontier_raise_error_when_missing_data`, use an unfit model

Reviewed By: saitcakmak

Differential Revision: D68214262
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D68214262

esantorella added a commit to esantorella/Ax that referenced this pull request Jan 17, 2025
…faults.FrontierEvaluatorTest (facebook#3241)

Summary:

* Fit a model in which fitting had been mocked out before
* Move some logic out of the `setUp` so that we don't fit a model in tests where it isn't needed
* In `test_pareto_frontier_raise_error_when_missing_data`, use an unfit model

Reviewed By: saitcakmak

Differential Revision: D68214262
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request has been merged in fd7f8ef.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
CLA Signed Do not delete this pull request or issue due to inactivity. fb-exported Merged
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants