-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 322
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fit model instead of mocking out model fitting in test_botorch_moo_defaults.FrontierEvaluatorTest #3241
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D68214262 |
esantorella
added a commit
to esantorella/Ax
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 16, 2025
…faults.FrontierEvaluatorTest (facebook#3241) Summary: * Fit a model in which fitting had been mocked out before * Move some logic out of the `setUp` so that we don't fit a model in tests where it isn't needed * In `test_pareto_frontier_raise_error_when_missing_data`, use an unfit model Reviewed By: saitcakmak Differential Revision: D68214262
041b68f
to
9fedc30
Compare
This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D68214262 |
esantorella
added a commit
to esantorella/Ax
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 17, 2025
…faults.FrontierEvaluatorTest (facebook#3241) Summary: * Fit a model in which fitting had been mocked out before * Move some logic out of the `setUp` so that we don't fit a model in tests where it isn't needed * In `test_pareto_frontier_raise_error_when_missing_data`, use an unfit model Reviewed By: saitcakmak Differential Revision: D68214262
9fedc30
to
6f96f36
Compare
This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D68214262 |
…faults.FrontierEvaluatorTest (facebook#3241) Summary: * Fit a model in which fitting had been mocked out before * Move some logic out of the `setUp` so that we don't fit a model in tests where it isn't needed * In `test_pareto_frontier_raise_error_when_missing_data`, use an unfit model Reviewed By: saitcakmak Differential Revision: D68214262
6f96f36
to
d747f64
Compare
This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D68214262 |
esantorella
added a commit
to esantorella/Ax
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 17, 2025
…faults.FrontierEvaluatorTest (facebook#3241) Summary: * Fit a model in which fitting had been mocked out before * Move some logic out of the `setUp` so that we don't fit a model in tests where it isn't needed * In `test_pareto_frontier_raise_error_when_missing_data`, use an unfit model Reviewed By: saitcakmak Differential Revision: D68214262
This pull request has been merged in fd7f8ef. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary:
setUp
so that we don't fit a model in tests where it isn't neededtest_pareto_frontier_raise_error_when_missing_data
, use an unfit modelDifferential Revision: D68214262