Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix Memory Leak in AnimatedWithChildren #49217

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,74 @@
/**
* Copyright (c) Meta Platforms, Inc. and affiliates.
*
* This source code is licensed under the MIT license found in the
* LICENSE file in the root directory of this source tree.
*
* @format
* @oncall react_native
*/

describe('AnimatedWithChildren', () => {
let AnimatedWithChildren;
let AnimatedValue;

beforeEach(() => {
jest.resetModules();
AnimatedWithChildren = require('../nodes/AnimatedWithChildren').default;
AnimatedValue = require('../nodes/AnimatedValue').default;
});

it('adds a child to the children array when it is not already present', () => {
const parent = new AnimatedWithChildren();
const child = new AnimatedValue(0);

expect(parent.__getChildren().length).toBe(0);

parent.__addChild(child);
expect(parent.__getChildren().length).toBe(1);
expect(parent.__getChildren()).toContain(child);
});

it('prevents adding the same child more than once to the children array', () => {
const parent = new AnimatedWithChildren();
const child = new AnimatedValue(0);

parent.__addChild(child);
expect(parent.__getChildren().length).toBe(1);

parent.__addChild(child);
expect(parent.__getChildren().length).toBe(1);
});

it('removes a child correctly from the children array when it exists', () => {
const parent = new AnimatedWithChildren();
const child1 = new AnimatedValue(0);
const child2 = new AnimatedValue(10);

parent.__addChild(child1);
parent.__addChild(child2);
expect(parent.__getChildren().length).toBe(2);

parent.__removeChild(child1);
expect(parent.__getChildren().length).toBe(1);
expect(parent.__getChildren()).not.toContain(child1);
expect(parent.__getChildren()).toContain(child2);

parent.__removeChild(child2);
expect(parent.__getChildren().length).toBe(0);
});

it('safely ignores removal calls for non-existent children in the children array', () => {
const parent = new AnimatedWithChildren();
const child = new AnimatedValue(0);

parent.__addChild(child);
expect(parent.__getChildren().length).toBe(1);

parent.__removeChild(child);
expect(parent.__getChildren().length).toBe(0);

expect(() => parent.__removeChild(child)).not.toThrow();
expect(parent.__getChildren().length).toBe(0);
});
});
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -39,6 +39,10 @@ export default class AnimatedWithChildren extends AnimatedNode {
}

__addChild(child: AnimatedNode): void {
// Prevent adding duplicate animated nodes.
if (this._children.includes(child)) {
return;
}
Comment on lines 41 to +45
Copy link
Author

@c-miles c-miles Feb 5, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This check prevents duplicate animated nodes from being added, which fixes the memory leak we observed.

The fact that _addChild is being called repeatedly with the same node may suggest an opportunity for further architectural review, though this fix addresses the immediate issue.

if (this._children.length === 0) {
this.__attach();
}
Expand All @@ -53,7 +57,6 @@ export default class AnimatedWithChildren extends AnimatedNode {
__removeChild(child: AnimatedNode): void {
const index = this._children.indexOf(child);
if (index === -1) {
console.warn("Trying to remove a child that doesn't exist");
Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Assumed duplicate removals are expected during cleanup; with __addChild now preventing duplicates, the warning in __removeChild causes unnecessary test failures and log noise.

return;
}
if (this.__isNative && child.__isNative) {
Expand Down
Loading