FSDP: Added fix + Regression test for incorrect params_group mapping in optimizer state sharding#1202
Conversation
|
Hi @Shasha-17! Thank you for your pull request and welcome to our community. Action RequiredIn order to merge any pull request (code, docs, etc.), we require contributors to sign our Contributor License Agreement, and we don't seem to have one on file for you. ProcessIn order for us to review and merge your suggested changes, please sign at https://code.facebook.com/cla. If you are contributing on behalf of someone else (eg your employer), the individual CLA may not be sufficient and your employer may need to sign the corporate CLA. Once the CLA is signed, our tooling will perform checks and validations. Afterwards, the pull request will be tagged with If you have received this in error or have any questions, please contact us at [email protected]. Thanks! |
|
Thank you for signing our Contributor License Agreement. We can now accept your code for this (and any) Meta Open Source project. Thanks! |
What does this PR do?
This PR fixes a correctness issue in FSDP optimizer state sharding where
param_groupswere reconstructed using a global count derived fromparam_id_map.values().The previous logic relied on
itertools.groupby, which only removesadjacent duplicates and assumes ordered, contiguous IDs. This could
produce incorrect parameter mappings and silently corrupt optimizer
state for non-contiguous or partially unused parameter layouts.
What is changed?
param_id_mapNoneentries corresponding to unused parametersNonemappingsTesting
test_fsdp_optim_utils.pypytest tests/nn/data_parallel/test_fsdp_optim_utils.py- failed before fix, passed after fixBefore submitting
PR review
Anyone in the community is free to review the PR once the tests have passed.
If we didn't discuss your PR in Github issues there's a high chance it will not be merged.