Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Feb 13, 2025. It is now read-only.

Conversation

@febo
Copy link
Owner

@febo febo commented Feb 12, 2025

Similar to #7 but instructions specify account indices instead.

@febo
Copy link
Owner Author

febo commented Feb 13, 2025

When considering only the Batch processor implementation, the "positional" version marginally uses more CU: 1545 vs 1511 of the non-positional one. But when used in a CPI, it takes more CUs since accounts need to be deduped on-chain.

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants