Skip to content

Conversation

@fidlip
Copy link

@fidlip fidlip commented May 9, 2024

Hi, I have fixed #190 and I believe it follows MDN now.

(sorry for confussion, I accidentally removed original PR, so 've created this new one.)

Interprets percentage value in linear-gradient stops as it should and leaves original solution for other units as fallback (We do not know size of filled area so can not convert values to exact percentage or number representation as stated in MDN.)
@fidlip
Copy link
Author

fidlip commented Jul 1, 2024

@felixfbecker Would there please be any progress with this PR?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Linear gradient stops are badly interpreted

1 participant