Skip to content

chore: set CODEOWNERS - #585

Merged
rjan90 merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
chore/set-codeowners
Aug 1, 2026
Merged

chore: set CODEOWNERS#585
rjan90 merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
chore/set-codeowners

Conversation

@BigLep

@BigLep BigLep commented Jul 31, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@BigLep BigLep self-assigned this Jul 31, 2026
@BigLep
BigLep requested a review from rjan90 July 31, 2026 22:49
@github-project-automation github-project-automation Bot moved this to 📌 Triage in FilOz Jul 31, 2026
@BigLep

BigLep commented Aug 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

@rvagg @LexLuthr: FYI that you are being made a CODEOWNER in this PR.

@BigLep
BigLep marked this pull request as ready for review August 1, 2026 00:13
Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings August 1, 2026 00:13

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

Adds a repository-wide CODEOWNERS configuration so that changes automatically request reviews from the specified owners, aligning ownership with the referenced FOC Engineering Workstreams proposal.

Changes:

  • Introduces .github/CODEOWNERS with a default rule applying to all files.
  • Documents the source proposal via inline comments.

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

@github-project-automation github-project-automation Bot moved this from 📌 Triage to ✔️ Approved by reviewer in FilOz Aug 1, 2026
@rjan90
rjan90 merged commit 17b1c64 into master Aug 1, 2026
6 checks passed
@rjan90
rjan90 deleted the chore/set-codeowners branch August 1, 2026 08:10
@github-project-automation github-project-automation Bot moved this from ✔️ Approved by reviewer to 🎉 Done in FilOz Aug 1, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

Status: 🎉 Done

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants