Update Load Balancer Threats

[zigmax]

First commit of threats for Load Balancer.

[linux-foundation-easycla]

The committers listed above are authorized under a signed CLA.

• ✅ login: zigmax / name: Maxime Coquerel (f3f6291, 0daa1ea, f669803, f27097b, 9a6315b, ed39b1c, 64ce289, 441fbc8, a5ee3b7, 49a4d95, 71a0f8e, 96d8e21, d729982, 99a1d52, 6e2fa87, 69f54b0, 849bc7e, fb77183, 90d6ba3, 0a65751, 59e5fe9)
• ✅ login: eddie-knight / name: Eddie Knight (b98a3aa)
• ✅ login: mlysaght2017 / name: Michael Lysaght (eae15de, 2042303, 064c388, 42ccc58, 8b89a00, 16f8ce3, 46522b9, 5ece6bb, de3714e, 3590f5c)

[netlify]

✅ Deploy Preview for common-cloud-controls canceled.

Name	Link
🔨 Latest commit	b98a3aa
🔍 Latest deploy log	https://app.netlify.com/projects/common-cloud-controls/deploys/683742bce9f93000084994d6

[mlysaght2017]

@zigmax @eddie-knight

• I had a stab at refactoring the threats to align with the new format and to also add in common (shared) threats and remove duplications from the service specific threats

I've also had a stab at a controls set. I'm unsure about some of the testing requirements as some of them feel excessive compare to many of the other testing requirements we've seen so far and am also just guessing on some of the parameters for those tests that might make sense...

Would really like us to be able to hand this over to @damienjburks in next few days...

[mlysaght2017]

Needs refactoring to align with new format and to also add common (shared) threats.

[zigmax]

Needs refactoring to align with new format and to also add common (shared) threats.

@mlysaght2017 Thanks for your help.

[mlysaght2017]

@zigmax - as mentioned, the controls are just a stab - I think they align ok with the threats, just really not sure if thats how detailed we want to go on the testing requirements, particularly if some of these controls are well managed and well documented by the CSPs...

[zigmax]

@mlysaght2017 Thanks for the feedback. I can cancel the pull request, and we can proceed with the controls and threats that Paul created. #713

[mlysaght2017]

@zigmax - I've reviewed the threats and controls again and am happy with how they exist on this PR. Paul Bayer is having issues with CLA so I would like us to run with your PR to keep momentum.

[mlysaght2017]

@eddie-knight @damienjburks - can you please review/approve

[mlysaght2017]

@zigmax - added some suggestions and removed some of the style deviations. I think once you get through that last batch, I'm good.

[mlysaght2017]

@eddie-knight @damienjburks - can you please review again - I think we've gotten this to a good state now.

If you approve, we can move it over to Damien for RC

[damienjburks]

LGTM! Approved