[Proposal] New Project Maturity Levels#233
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Eddie Knight <knight@linux.com>
eddie-knight
requested review from
DamianReeves,
TheJuanAndOnly99,
arroyo,
awaiken,
caldeirav,
chris-twiner,
eminty69,
fgogolli,
harkeganesh,
jgavronsky,
maria-mcparland,
mindthegab,
opoupeney,
psmulovics and
rocketstack-matt
Signed-off-by: Eddie Knight <knight@linux.com>
|
👍 |
This comment was marked as resolved.
This comment was marked as resolved.
Sorry, something went wrong.
This comment was marked as resolved.
This comment was marked as resolved.
|
Yes @eddie-knight - 100% correct. In the spirit of moving forward, then, my vote becomes a +1 with the condition that this PR is not merged until #230 is also contextually merged / resolved. I'm more than happy to work with the TOC members who will carry that out as needed. This way we don't have any point in time in which two separate sets of lifecycle stages are published. |
|
+1 |
2 similar comments
|
+1 |
|
+1 |
|
+1 |
|
@eddie-knight would resolve conflicts and would be merged after #finos/community/374 |
eddie-knight
moved this to Paused / Blocked
in FINOS Technical Oversight Committee Backlog
|
+1 |
eddie-knight
moved this from Paused / Blocked
to 🏗 In progress
in FINOS Technical Oversight Committee Backlog
eddie-knight
force-pushed
the
new-lifecycle
branch
from
192fd44 to
2bcb79e
Compare
modified: operations/processes/projects/graduation.md
Signed-off-by: Eddie Knight <knight@linux.com>
|
@eddie-knight please review finos/community#388 which from my side, unlocks merging this in. Looking forward to it! |
|
@mindthegab I gave it a look yesterday and it appears to be all in line with what we discussed on our most recent call. Only note is that one or more issue templates are stubs, but I understand you've got that tracked. |
|
+1 |
14 participants
All TOC members are asked to respond to this proposal in the form of a +1, -1, or 0 to formally abstain.
Part of #167
This is the culmination of nearly one year of open discussion among the TOC and public meeting participants, along with active guidance from FINOS staff.
The goal of this update is to take a step toward alignment with proven project lifecycle processes from other open source foundations, while increasing clarity around the responsibility of the TOC in the project lifecycle. Follow-up contributions will include updates to improve processes related to contribution applications, promotion requests, and health reviews.
This vote will be open until Friday September 26th at 1700PST.
Functional changes must not be applied to this PR while the vote is open.
In this pull request
Not included in this pull request