Skip to content

Conversation

@WardBrian
Copy link
Collaborator

As suggested in the JOSS review issue openjournals/joss-reviews#9531 (comment)

@WardBrian WardBrian requested a review from jsoules December 2, 2025 15:56
Copy link
Collaborator

@jsoules jsoules left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think this is great; I made a couple wording tweaks which you can feel free to ignore.

Comment on lines +42 to +44
still builds the example models and that they still run as expected. We
recommend formatting the Python code with
[`black`](https://black.readthedocs.io/en/stable/) before submission.
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Have we blacked all our own codebase? If so, we could make this a requirement rather than a recommendation. (It is also fine to leave it as a recommendation)

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I agree, but I also don't want to make any requirement like that which isn't enforced by CI, which this currently is not

@magland
Copy link
Collaborator

magland commented Dec 2, 2025

Looks good to me

@WardBrian WardBrian merged commit bce41e1 into main Dec 2, 2025
2 checks passed
@WardBrian WardBrian deleted the contributing.md branch December 2, 2025 16:29
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants