option for PMC boundary in mode solver#2472
option for PMC boundary in mode solver#2472dbochkov-flexcompute wants to merge 1 commit intodevelopfrom
Conversation
dbochkov-flexcompute
force-pushed
the
daniil/mode-pmc
branch
from
0161632 to
4f267b8
Compare
| dxf = sp.csr_matrix(sp.diags([-1, 1], [0, 1], shape=(Nx, Nx))) | ||
| if not pmc: | ||
| if pmc_pos: | ||
| dxf[-1, -1] = 0.0 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
So I don't think this is right, this will just impose PEC on the next-to-last grid boundary, right?
To impose PMC, this can be placed in the backward derivatives instead. However, it is still tricky: there it will impose it at the last grid center, not at the last grid boundary. I think it's not possible to impose it at the last boundary without expanding by one pixel, and then doing something like seetting a value of 2 for the derivative, like we do for pmc on the negative side (but there we can do without an extra pixel). I think this might have been the reason I only had it working on the negative side in the first place...
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Ah, yeah, this is not quite correct. I believe what I did here is to impose PMC in the middle of the last cell: specifically here by setting this last coefficient to zero we effectively impose the normal derivative of tangential E field to be zero. I did forget to set tangential H to zero there (by setting dxb[-1, -1] = 0.0 and dyb[-1, -1] = 0.0), but somehow it did not matter
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Ah, you are right. I think probably both of those decouple that last dual location from the rest of the simulation, so the only thing is if you don't do both, you might get spurious modes that are purely localized to that location? In fact I see we do both of those for PEC yet we still had to add this to avoid such modes. And we don't do it for the right boundary, because there's no actual field there, but if the PMC right boundary is defined at the last dual location, then will probably be needed at least in the tensorial case where we solve for both E and H?
3 participants
No description provided.