Optimized Utils.name() method #57
Conversation
WalkthroughThis pull request introduces a new GitHub Actions workflow that automates generating and reporting JaCoCo code coverage on pull requests targeting the main branches. It also updates the project’s Maven configuration by bumping the version, upgrading the Lombok library, replacing the Lombok and Cobertura plugins with the JaCoCo Maven plugin, and streamlining a utility method used for class name formatting. These changes integrate code coverage reporting into the CI process and refine the project's build configuration and utility logic. Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant PR as "Pull Request"
participant GH as "GitHub Actions"
participant CO as "Checkout Action"
participant JDK as "Setup JDK"
participant MVN as "Maven Build & Test"
participant JC as "JaCoCo Report Action"
PR->>GH: Open pull request (targeting main/master)
GH->>CO: Checkout the repository (full history)
GH->>JDK: Set up JDK 8 (Temurin)
GH->>MVN: Run Maven build and tests (trigger JaCoCo report)
MVN->>GH: Generate JaCoCo XML report
GH->>JC: Locate report files and process JaCoCo report
JC->>PR: Post coverage summary as a comment
Poem
Tip ⚡💬 Agentic Chat (Pro Plan, General Availability)
✨ Finishing Touches
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
📊 JaCoCo Code Coverage
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
.github/workflows/coverage-report.yml (1)
1-58: Well-structured GitHub Actions workflow for code coverage reporting.The workflow is properly set up to:
- Run on PRs to main/master branches
- Set appropriate permissions
- Build and test the project
- Generate and post JaCoCo reports as PR comments
Two suggestions:
- Consider documenting the reasoning behind the 95% coverage thresholds in the workflow file, as this is quite high and may be challenging to meet initially.
- Add a newline at the end of the file to comply with YAML best practices.
echo "Overall Coverage: ${{ steps.jacoco.outputs.coverage-overall }}%" echo "Changed Files Coverage: ${{ steps.jacoco.outputs.coverage-changed-files }}%" +🧰 Tools
🪛 YAMLlint (1.35.1)
[error] 58-58: no new line character at the end of file
(new-line-at-end-of-file)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
.github/workflows/coverage-report.yml(1 hunks)pom.xml(3 hunks)src/main/java/com/flipkart/databuilderframework/engine/Utils.java(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 YAMLlint (1.35.1)
.github/workflows/coverage-report.yml
[error] 58-58: no new line character at the end of file
(new-line-at-end-of-file)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
src/main/java/com/flipkart/databuilderframework/engine/Utils.java (1)
32-34: Improved implementation of the name(Class<?>) method.The change optimizes the implementation by directly applying the case format transformation within the
computeIfAbsentlambda. This streamlines the code while maintaining the same behavior and thread safety provided by ConcurrentHashMap.pom.xml (3)
7-7: Version update to 0.5.13-RC1.This version increment indicates a release candidate for a new minor version.
65-65: Updated Lombok version from 1.16.6 to 1.18.30.Good improvement to use a more recent version of Lombok, which likely includes performance improvements, bug fixes, and better compatibility with newer Java versions.
120-137: Replaced Cobertura with JaCoCo for code coverage analysis.Adding JaCoCo is a good choice as it's more actively maintained than Cobertura and better integrated with modern CI/CD workflows. The configuration looks standard with the prepare-agent and report goals properly configured.
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Chores