feat(rwasm-optimisation): fixed wasmtime usage to get best performance

[bfdays]

No description provided.

[github-actions]

Criterion results (vs baseline)

running 2 tests
test tests::fib32_rwasm_test ... ignored
test tests::fib32_wasmtime_test ... ignored

test result: ok. 0 passed; 0 failed; 2 ignored; 0 measured; 0 filtered out; finished in 0.00s

Comparisons/bitvec      time:   [18.434 µs 18.445 µs 18.456 µs]
Found 22 outliers among 200 measurements (11.00%)
  4 (2.00%) high mild
  18 (9.00%) high severe
Comparisons/bitvec_inlined
                        time:   [3.4251 µs 3.4260 µs 3.4270 µs]
Found 32 outliers among 200 measurements (16.00%)
  9 (4.50%) low severe
  3 (1.50%) low mild
  11 (5.50%) high mild
  9 (4.50%) high severe
Comparisons/bitvec_inlined (half of inline store)
                        time:   [1.8663 µs 1.8696 µs 1.8741 µs]
Found 28 outliers among 200 measurements (14.00%)
  8 (4.00%) low severe
  2 (1.00%) low mild
  9 (4.50%) high mild
  9 (4.50%) high severe
RwasmModule {
 .function_begin_0 (#0)
  0000: StackCheck(5)
  0001: I32Const(1)
  0002: MemoryGrow
  0003: Drop
  0004: I32Const(0)
  0005: I32Const(0)
  0006: I32Const(80)
  0007: MemoryInit(0)
  0008: DataDrop(1)
  0009: ReturnCallInternal(10)
 .function_end

 .function_begin_10 (#1)
  0010: SignatureCheck(0)
  0011: ConsumeFuel(4)
  0012: StackCheck(4)
  0013: LocalGet(1)
  0014: LocalGet(1)
  0015: I32Load(4)
  0016: LocalGet(2)
  0017: I32Load(0)
  0018: LocalSet(2)
  0019: LocalGet(2)
  0020: LocalSet(3)
  0021: LocalGet(1)
  0022: LocalSet(2)
  0023: Drop
  0024: Return
 .function_end

 .ro_data: [61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 6a, 6b, 6c, 6d, 6e, 6f, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 7a, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 6a, 6b, 6c, 6d, 6e, 6f, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 7a, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 6a, 6b, 6c, 6d, 6e, 6f, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 7a, 61, 62],
 .ro_elem: [],
}

Comparisons/bitvec_inlined (through ExecutionEngine)
                        time:   [3.3879 ms 3.3891 ms 3.3905 ms]
Found 12 outliers among 200 measurements (6.00%)
  8 (4.00%) high mild
  4 (2.00%) high severe

Comparisons Module Compilation/bench_evm
                        time:   [319.99 ns 320.20 ns 320.44 ns]
Found 8 outliers among 200 measurements (4.00%)
  2 (1.00%) low mild
  4 (2.00%) high mild
  2 (1.00%) high severe
Comparisons Module Compilation/bench_wasmtime
                        time:   [4.8618 ms 4.8633 ms 4.8649 ms]
Found 1 outliers among 200 measurements (0.50%)
  1 (0.50%) high severe
Comparisons Module Compilation/bench_wasmi
                        time:   [21.311 µs 21.563 µs 21.886 µs]
Found 8 outliers among 200 measurements (4.00%)
  8 (4.00%) high severe
Comparisons Module Compilation/bench_rwasm
                        time:   [26.601 µs 26.609 µs 26.618 µs]
Found 17 outliers among 200 measurements (8.50%)
  7 (3.50%) low severe
  2 (1.00%) high mild
  8 (4.00%) high severe

Comparisons Fib256/bench_native
                        time:   [41.280 ns 41.288 ns 41.296 ns]
Found 26 outliers among 200 measurements (13.00%)
  11 (5.50%) low severe
  4 (2.00%) low mild
  6 (3.00%) high mild
  5 (2.50%) high severe
Comparisons Fib256/bench_evm
                        time:   [20.671 µs 20.688 µs 20.704 µs]
Found 5 outliers among 200 measurements (2.50%)
  5 (2.50%) high mild
Comparisons Fib256/bench_wasmtime
                        time:   [3.4517 µs 3.4546 µs 3.4576 µs]
Found 28 outliers among 200 measurements (14.00%)
  7 (3.50%) low severe
  3 (1.50%) low mild
  10 (5.00%) high mild
  8 (4.00%) high severe
Comparisons Fib256/bench_wasmi
                        time:   [6.3279 µs 6.3302 µs 6.3326 µs]
Found 11 outliers among 200 measurements (5.50%)
  7 (3.50%) low mild
  3 (1.50%) high mild
  1 (0.50%) high severe
Comparisons Fib256/bench_rwasm
                        time:   [4.3529 µs 4.3721 µs 4.3918 µs]
Found 33 outliers among 200 measurements (16.50%)
  4 (2.00%) low severe
  3 (1.50%) low mild
  8 (4.00%) high mild
  18 (9.00%) high severe

Comparisons fib32/bench_native
                        time:   [6.8779 ns 6.8792 ns 6.8804 ns]
Found 19 outliers among 200 measurements (9.50%)
  9 (4.50%) low severe
  4 (2.00%) low mild
  2 (1.00%) high mild
  4 (2.00%) high severe
Comparisons fib32/bench_evm
                        time:   [22.919 µs 22.936 µs 22.955 µs]
Found 6 outliers among 200 measurements (3.00%)
  6 (3.00%) high mild
Comparisons fib32/bench_wasmtime
                        time:   [348.74 ns 348.87 ns 349.00 ns]
Found 8 outliers among 200 measurements (4.00%)
  7 (3.50%) low mild
  1 (0.50%) high severe
Comparisons fib32/bench_wasmi
                        time:   [418.12 ns 418.43 ns 418.75 ns]
Found 10 outliers among 200 measurements (5.00%)
  2 (1.00%) low mild
  8 (4.00%) high mild
Comparisons fib32/bench_rwasm
                        time:   [1.3066 µs 1.3071 µs 1.3076 µs]
Found 12 outliers among 200 measurements (6.00%)
  4 (2.00%) low mild
  4 (2.00%) high mild
  4 (2.00%) high severe

Comparisons fib64/bench_native
                        time:   [6.9353 ns 6.9380 ns 6.9408 ns]
Found 17 outliers among 200 measurements (8.50%)
  7 (3.50%) low mild
  6 (3.00%) high mild
  4 (2.00%) high severe
Comparisons fib64/bench_evm
                        time:   [24.887 µs 24.995 µs 25.093 µs]
Found 11 outliers among 200 measurements (5.50%)
  11 (5.50%) high mild
Comparisons fib64/bench_wasmtime
                        time:   [3.2854 µs 3.2883 µs 3.2913 µs]
Found 24 outliers among 200 measurements (12.00%)
  7 (3.50%) low severe
  5 (2.50%) low mild
  5 (2.50%) high mild
  7 (3.50%) high severe
Comparisons fib64/bench_wasmi
                        time:   [2.0707 µs 2.0715 µs 2.0725 µs]
Found 20 outliers among 200 measurements (10.00%)
  3 (1.50%) low severe
  4 (2.00%) low mild
  7 (3.50%) high mild
  6 (3.00%) high severe
Comparisons fib64/bench_rwasm
                        time:   [4.5058 µs 4.5076 µs 4.5096 µs]
Found 13 outliers among 200 measurements (6.50%)
  3 (1.50%) low mild
  5 (2.50%) high mild
  5 (2.50%) high severe

Comparisons Module Parsing/bench_evm
                        time:   [311.91 ps 312.60 ps 313.41 ps]
Found 25 outliers among 200 measurements (12.50%)
  5 (2.50%) high mild
  20 (10.00%) high severe
Comparisons Module Parsing/bench_wasmtime
                        time:   [37.247 µs 37.298 µs 37.349 µs]
Found 11 outliers among 200 measurements (5.50%)
  4 (2.00%) high mild
  7 (3.50%) high severe
Comparisons Module Parsing/bench_wasmi
                        time:   [19.648 µs 19.657 µs 19.666 µs]
Found 7 outliers among 200 measurements (3.50%)
  3 (1.50%) high mild
  4 (2.00%) high severe
Comparisons Module Parsing/bench_rwasm
                        time:   [10.238 µs 10.242 µs 10.246 µs]
Found 15 outliers among 200 measurements (7.50%)
  1 (0.50%) low severe
  2 (1.00%) low mild
  8 (4.00%) high mild

Heads-up: runner perf is noisy; treat deltas as a smoke check.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 20.68966% with 23 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
src/wasmtime/mod.rs	22.22%	21 Missing ⚠️
src/vm/engine.rs	0.00%	2 Missing ⚠️

📢 Thoughts on this report? Let us know!