Skip to content

Add Offline Analysis Tool for Mobile Web MCP#21

Merged
haifeng-li-at-salesforce merged 25 commits into
mainfrom
offlineAnalysis
Jul 8, 2025
Merged

Add Offline Analysis Tool for Mobile Web MCP#21
haifeng-li-at-salesforce merged 25 commits into
mainfrom
offlineAnalysis

Conversation

@haifeng-li-at-salesforce

@haifeng-li-at-salesforce haifeng-li-at-salesforce commented Jul 2, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🚀 Add Offline Analysis Tool for Mobile Web MCP

📋 Summary

This PR introduces a comprehensive offline analysis tool for Salesforce Lightning Web Components (LWC) that provides mobile-specific code analysis and recommendations. The tool integrates with the Model Context Protocol (MCP) to offer expert guidance for mobile-ready LWC development.

✨ Features Added

🔧 Core Offline Analysis Tool

  • Mobile Web Offline Analysis Tool (OfflineAnalysisTool)
    • Analyzes LWC components for mobile-specific issues
    • Provides detailed recommendations for mobile readiness
    • Integrates with ESLint and LWC Graph Analyzer plugin
    • Supports comprehensive error handling and graceful degradation

📊 Analysis Capabilities

  • Rule-based Analysis: Implements configurable rules for mobile-specific issues
  • Wire Configuration Analysis: Detects private wire configuration properties
  • Reactive Value Analysis: Identifies non-local property references in wire configs
  • Code Quality Assessment: Provides actionable recommendations for improvements

🧪 Comprehensive Test Coverage

  • Unit Tests: Complete test suite for all tool functionality
  • Error Handling Tests: Robust error scenario coverage
  • Integration Tests: End-to-end tool registration and analysis testing
  • Test Helpers: Reusable test utilities for consistent testing patterns

🏗️ Architecture Changes

New Tool Structure

packages/mobile-web/src/tools/mobile-offline/offline-analysis/
├── tool.ts              # Main OfflineAnalysisTool implementation
└── ruleConfig.ts        # Configurable analysis rules

Enhanced Base Tool

  • Updated BaseTool signature for better tool registration
  • Improved error handling and type safety
  • Enhanced service grounding text generation

Schema Enhancements

  • Analysis Schema: New schemas for code analysis results
  • LWC Schema: Enhanced LWC code type definitions
  • Tool Interface: Improved tool registration interface

Sample output

image

🧪 Testing

Test Coverage

  • 12/12 tests passing for the offline analysis tool
  • Comprehensive error handling test scenarios
  • Tool registration and integration tests
  • Code analysis functionality tests
  • Rule configuration validation tests

Test Categories

  1. Tool Properties: Validates tool metadata and configuration
  2. Tool Registration: Tests MCP server integration
  3. Code Analysis: End-to-end analysis functionality
  4. Error Handling: Robust error scenario coverage
  5. Private Methods: Internal functionality validation
  6. Tool Integration: Compatibility with existing patterns

✅ Checklist

  • Core offline analysis tool implementation
  • Comprehensive test coverage (12/12 tests passing)
  • Error handling and edge case coverage
  • MCP integration and tool registration
  • Rule configuration system
  • Type definitions and schemas
  • Documentation and usage examples
  • Performance optimization
  • Code quality and linting compliance

🎯 Impact

This PR significantly enhances the mobile web MCP tools by providing:

  • Expert Analysis: Professional-grade LWC analysis
  • Mobile Optimization: Specialized mobile development guidance
  • Developer Experience: Improved development workflow
  • Quality Assurance: Automated code quality checks
  • Scalability: Extensible rule-based analysis system

Ready for Review
Tests Passing
Documentation Complete
Performance Optimized

@haifeng-li-at-salesforce haifeng-li-at-salesforce requested a review from a team as a code owner July 2, 2025 22:54
@codecov-commenter

codecov-commenter commented Jul 3, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 93.30%. Comparing base (d9ef8c2) to head (c824585).
⚠️ Report is 453 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main      #21      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   91.20%   93.30%   +2.09%     
==========================================
  Files          22       27       +5     
  Lines         728      956     +228     
  Branches       98      114      +16     
==========================================
+ Hits          664      892     +228     
  Misses         64       64              
Flag Coverage Δ
evaluation 88.74% <ø> (ø)
mobile-web 99.50% <100.00%> (+0.63%) ⬆️
monorepo 93.30% <100.00%> (+2.09%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

Comment thread packages/mobile-web/package.json Outdated
Comment thread packages/mobile-web/resources/appReview/appReviewService.d.ts Outdated
Comment thread packages/mobile-web/src/schemas/analysisSchema.ts
Comment thread packages/mobile-web/src/schemas/analysisSchema.ts Outdated
Comment thread packages/mobile-web/src/schemas/lwcSchema.ts
Comment thread packages/mobile-web/src/tools/mobile-offline/offline-analysis/tool.ts Outdated
Comment thread packages/mobile-web/src/tools/mobile-offline/offline-analysis/tool.ts Outdated
Comment thread packages/mobile-web/src/tools/mobile-offline/offline-analysis/tool.ts Outdated
Comment thread packages/mobile-web/src/tools/mobile-offline/offline-analysis/tool.ts Outdated

@jhorst11 jhorst11 left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

can we fix the prettier formatting - otherwise besides ben's feedback LGTM - I'll need this in to get going on the offline-guidance too to share some of these new types and schemas

@ben-zhang-at-salesforce ben-zhang-at-salesforce left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

looks good!

Comment thread package.json Outdated
Comment thread packages/mobile-web/src/index.ts
Comment thread packages/mobile-web/package.json
Comment thread packages/mobile-web/src/schemas/lwcSchema.ts Outdated
Co-authored-by: Kevin Hawkins <khawkins@salesforce.com>
Comment thread packages/mobile-web/src/tools/mobile-offline/offline-analysis/ruleConfig.ts Outdated
Comment thread packages/mobile-web/src/tools/mobile-offline/offline-analysis/tool.ts Outdated

@khawkins khawkins left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks great! Thanks for your efforts. I'll follow up on the schema updates and some odds and ends.

…tool.ts

Co-authored-by: Kevin Hawkins <khawkins@salesforce.com>
@haifeng-li-at-salesforce haifeng-li-at-salesforce merged commit cf38b78 into main Jul 8, 2025
13 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants