feat: add resource parameter in client credentials requests

[gfyrag]

No description provided.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

A new optional Resource field is added to the ClientCredentialsRequest struct in the OIDC token request module. This extends the token request payload schema to support specifying a resource parameter in client credentials grant flows.

Changes

Cohort / File(s)	Summary
Struct field addition oidc/token_request.go	Added public Resource field with schema:"resource,omitempty" tag to ClientCredentialsRequest struct for optional resource parameter support in token requests

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes

Poem

🐰 A resource field hops in with grace,
Client credentials finds its place,
The schema stretches, optional and free,
One tiny change, yet helpful to see! ✨

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 2 | ❌ 1

❌ Failed checks (1 inconclusive)

Check name	Status	Explanation	Resolution
Description check	❓ Inconclusive	No pull request description was provided by the author, making it impossible to assess relevance to the changeset.	Add a pull request description explaining the purpose and context of adding the resource parameter to client credentials requests.

✅ Passed checks (2 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Title check	✅ Passed	The title accurately describes the main change: adding a resource parameter to client credentials requests, which matches the added Resource field in ClientCredentialsRequest struct.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

_{✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.}

✨ Finishing touches

• 📝 Generate docstrings

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Post copyable unit tests in a comment
• Commit unit tests in branch feat/client-credentials-resource

---

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 28.76%. Comparing base (6c6ceb8) to head (f65b767).
⚠️ Report is 6 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #543   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   28.76%   28.76%           
=======================================
  Files         172      172           
  Lines        6804     6804           
=======================================
  Hits         1957     1957           
  Misses       4730     4730           
  Partials      117      117           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.